Global in sentence

23561 examples of Global in a sentence

They were working on truly global products, and companies like Microsoft, Google, AstraZeneca, General Electric, Philips, have already answered in the affirmative the question that from their Bangalore and Hyderabad R&D centers they are able to produce products and services for the world.

The second kind of invisible innovation coming out of India is what we call outsourcing innovation to Indian companies, where many companies today are contracting Indian companies to do a major part of their product development work for their global products which are going to be sold to the entire world.

It's not a new product or a new process but a new way to organize work, and the most significant management innovation to come out of India, invented by the Indian offshoring industry is what we call the global delivery model.

What the global delivery model allows is, it allows you to take previously geographically core-located tasks, break them up into parts, send them around the world where the expertise and the cost structure exists, and then specify the means for reintegrating them.

The Internet is becoming a giant global computer, and every time you go on it, you upload a video, you do a Google search, you remix something, you're programming this big global computer that we all share.

The global economic crisis is opening up the world as well.

The core modus operandi of Wall Street almost brought down global capitalism.

So this technology push, a demographic kick from a new generation and a demand pull from a new economic global environment is causing the world to open up.

The Internet gives us access, not just to information and knowledge, but to the intelligence contained in the crania of other people on a global basis.

Could we create some kind of collective intelligence that goes beyond an individual or a group or a team to create, perhaps, some kind of consciousness on a global basis?

I read, I write, I think about global health a lot.

And what puts us together is that we have a common, at least, global understanding of what the word "business" is, or what it should be.

But we've also got to decide, do we like such global goals?

So what we'd like to propose is that we use them to involve people from all around the world in an historic first: the world's first truly global poll and consultation, where everyone everywhere has an equal voice for the very first time.

This is some of the most exciting stuff in development and democracy, where citizens on the edge of a network are helping to force open the process to make sure that the big global aid promises and vague stuff up at the top really delivers for people at a grassroots level and inverts that pyramid.

And look at the state of global politics today.

Our world leaders, our global politics, currently can't get it done.

It's got to come from us, and I see this process of deciding democratically in a bottom-up fashion what the world wants to work on together as one vital means by which we can crowdsource the force to really build that constituency that's going to reinvigorate global governance in the 21st century.

But these conferences are going on, and I know people get skeptical and cynical about the big global summits and the promises and their never being kept, but actually, the bits that are, are making a difference, and what the politicians need is more permission from the public.

So let me talk a little bit about why we need to do that, because our global commons is under attack in a variety of ways, and none of the sources of threat to the global commons will be solved by building walls.

It's a $10-billion-a-year discontinuity in the global transport system.

This is an attack on the global commons.

This is part of cybercrime which is a $2-trillion-a-year discontinuity in the global economy.

Another thing I worry about in the global commons is the threat posed by trafficking, by the movement of narcotics, opium, here coming out of Afghanistan through Europe over to the United States.

Trafficking moves largely at sea but in other parts of the global commons.

This kind of trafficking, in narcotics, in humans, in weapons, God forbid, in weapons of mass destruction, is part of the threat to the global commons.

So this terrorism concern is also part of the global commons, and what we must address.

But then we were wondering whether this is a local phenomenon, or is truly global?

We have tar paper on the rooftops that bounces heat back into the atmosphere, contributing to global climate change, no doubt.

It's not only to defend the Chinese regime from overseas, from the universal values, but also to prevent China's own citizens to access the global free Internet, and even separate themselves into blocks, not united.

Related words