Global
in sentence
23561 examples of Global in a sentence
It does not mean that previous climate models were excessively alarmist, or that we can take a more relaxed approach to reining in
global
warming.
Global
emissions would need to be reduced by 4-6% every year, until they reached zero.
But it is just one paper; there is still a lot more to learn about our capacity to limit
global
warming.
After all, there are no instruments to enforce strict rules at the
global
level, and the unwinding of today’s
global
imbalances – led by some revaluation of the renminbi and China’s shift to a growth model based on stronger domestic demand – might be only a matter of time.
This must change if the region is to provide modern jobs and better lives to its booming population and keep up with
global
development.
While there are no international standardized tests in science and math at the university level, fourth-, eighth-, and tenth-grade students in the Muslim world test below the
global
average in these subjects, according to the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Program for International Student Assessment.
Muslim countries spend, on average, only about 0.5% of their GDP on research and development, compared to the
global
average of 1.78% of GDP and the OECD average of above 2%.
The number of people working in science fields in the Muslim world is also well below the
global
average.
China and the United States are the two largest GHG emitters, and it seems unlikely that any
global
agreement to reduce emissions will be effective unless both participate.
We have selected three widely discussed methods of allocating GHG emission quotas to different countries:The equal per capita emission rights approach allocates emission rights to countries in proportion to their population, but only for the remaining portion of the
global
“carbon budget” – that is, for the amount that can still be emitted, between now and 2050, without causing dangerous, irreversible climate change.
(This limit is usually stated as a 2oC rise in
global
temperature.)
It allocates an equal share of the overall
global
carbon budget, taking into account the portion that has already been consumed.
The difference shows that the dispute between developed and developing countries over the principle of historical responsibility accounts for about 40% of the
global
GHG emissions that can occur from 1850 to 2050 without exceeding the carbon budget.
These widely different carbon Gini coefficients indicate that the world lacks a common understanding of what would be a fair approach to addressing
global
climate change.
When the de facto grandfathering principle is included, our carbon Gini coefficient indicates that as much as 70% of the
global
carbon budget is still in dispute between rich and poor countries.
How will Israel address intensifying
global
opposition to the de facto apartheid regime implied by denying Palestinians throughout Israel and Palestine the same political rights as Israeli Jews?
With China’s growing importance in the world order, it needs to be given space to forge its own approach to
global
economic leadership.
My interpretation of the World Bank’s record is that its role has been most consistently positive when it helps countries with “soft” development infrastructure: technical assistance and serving as a
global
knowledge bank.
Increased investment to retrofit the economy for
global
warming would help to stimulate economic activity, growth, and job creation.
Even before the crisis, there was a rebalancing of economic power – in fact, a correction of a 200-year historical anomaly, in which Asia’s share of
global
GDP fell from nearly 50% to, at one point, below 10%.
As a result,
global
economic rebalancing is likely to accelerate, almost inevitably giving rise to political tensions.
With all of the problems confronting the
global
economy, we will be lucky if these strains do not begin to manifest themselves within the next twelve months.
The answer to this question will determine not just the geography of prosperity in the coming decades, but also what the balance of
global
economic activity will look like in 2030 or 2050.
The impact on the
global
system, with its existing structure of multilateral institutions (such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization) and myriad standard-setting and consensus-building organizations, may be smaller than one thinks.
In fact, the US could do well as a source of innovation and new products, selling to a larger
global
market.
Turning from speculative conditions to the fundamentals of oil production, it is far from clear that sanctions will reduce Iran’s exports sufficiently to affect the
global
balance of supply and demand.
The fact that oil traders constantly redirect oil cargoes around the globe explains why most analysts expect sanctions to reduce
global
oil supplies by less than 500,000 barrels a day.
A shift on this scale would be smaller than the 700,000-barrel collapse of Venezuelan oil exports since last year, and much smaller than the increase in US daily output of 1.1 million barrels projected over the next 12 months, not to mention the probable reduction in
global
oil demand caused by the sharp increase in prices since last summer.
In short, the Iran sanctions will have less impact on the
global
balance of supply and demand than the performance of the world economy and the behavior of other oil producers.
But, whatever we choose to call it, the danger is that the
global
economic crisis is providing an almost perfect alibi for governments and others in the region to continue with “business as usual,” when what is needed is a loud wake-up call.
Back
Next
Related words
Economy
Financial
Economic
Countries
Crisis
World
Which
Growth
Would
Their
Warming
Trade
Could
Climate
International
System
Years
Other
About
Markets