Example collocations logo

Funds in sentence

2629 examples of Funds in a sentence

If sustainable nanotechnology is to be built on sound science, global research strategies must be supported by innovative policies and accompanied by sufficient funds to do the job.
Isn’t it obvious to investors that they are voluntarily transferring their clients’ funds to the pockets of bankers?
Investors, and the rest of us, would be much better off if these funds flowed to more productive companies, perhaps with an amount equivalent to what would be transferred to bankers’ bonuses redirected to well-managed charities.
In Malaysia, Prime Minister Najib Razak has been at the center of a major political scandal since nearly $700 million in unaccounted funds was found in his bank accounts.
Pumping vast taxpayer funds into financial behemoths does not solve the deeper problem of deflating an overleveraged society.
A second problem with tax cuts is that they might well have only a limited impact on demand in the short run, with the private sector hoarding a significant share of the funds to repair badly over-leveraged balance sheets.
This includes: funds to stop the transmission of AIDS from mothers to infants; funds to help fight infections such as tuberculosis that accompany AIDS; and with good program design, even funds for anti-retroviral therapies.
Recent breakthroughs in basic science give hope that a vaccine can be developed within a decade, if the billions of dollars of research and development funds are mobilized by both public and private sectors.
They should also abolish the carried interest deduction (which benefits wealthy managers of private equity and hedge funds), as Trump himself promised to do during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Given limited resources, grant-making authorities are always tempted to channel a higher proportion of funds toward the latter.
Universities, pension funds, churches, banks, and even the heirs to the Rockefeller oil fortune are pulling their money out of fossil-fuel assets or are considering the possibility of divestment – an option made increasingly attractive by the swiftly falling cost of renewable energy.
Meanwhile, pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors are increasingly investing in infrastructure.
Indeed, some analysts have even suggested that the US create a non-partisan corporation for public diplomacy that would receive government and private funds, but would stimulate independent cross-border communications.
Unfortunately, the funds needed to implement these initiatives have not flowed as rapidly as the rhetoric.
The Fed had been saying for several months that it would raise the federal funds rate when the labor market approached full employment and when FOMC members could anticipate that annual inflation would reach 2%.
Indeed, several major pension funds and institutional investors are now divesting from fossil-fuel companies.
A United States Senate report released in February revealed flagrant abuse of state funds in Equatorial Guinea.
The report mentions other ruling dynasties in the region, including Gabon’s Bongo clan, which is also accused of abusing public funds.
At last year’s replenishment conference, $2.1 billion in donor funds were leveraged to bring about an additional $26 billion in pledges from national governments.
To enhance the funds’ effectiveness, GPE allocates 30% of funding based on the achievement of specific results chosen by the government and its development partners in the areas of learning quality, education-system efficiency, and equity.
Against this backdrop, participants at the Oslo Summit will be discussing how to generate the momentum and political will to broaden and deepen the donor base, and assess the highest-impact use of these funds.
For example, schools in disadvantaged neighborhoods should be allowed to tender for funds for educational innovation.
While global warming is a serious challenge (and will exacerbate other problems), cutting carbon emissions is a poor solution – and a poor use of funds compared to the alternatives.
The IMF is rounding up the money from the usual sources: its own funds, the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, foreign governments, and to a modest extent, foreign commercial banks.
Indeed, Kabila has had ten years, and seemingly endless supplies of goodwill and funds from international donors, to turn the tide on the DRC’s poverty, graft, and mismanagement.
Programs must be tailored to ensure that funds are not captured by kleptocratic elites.
Once refugees are made eligible for IDA grants, the World Bank could quickly raise funds – as much as $5 billion annually – by issuing bonds, using its recently awarded triple-A credit rating.
Over time, it would repay its investors with funds collected through special IDA replenishment calls.
One critical question remains: Who is accountable for the funds delivered to refugees?
When the Bank delivers funds to a government, it is clear who is accountable.
BackNext