Example collocations logo

Funding in sentence

2082 examples of Funding in a sentence

Making matters worse, such funding accumulated interest with every transfer, adding to the costs of shadow-bank borrowing.
We’ve seen this on issues ranging from Syria to Iran, North Korea, terrorism, cyber security, asylum-seekers and refugees, migration, Ebola, and the emerging crisis in humanitarian-aid funding.
The home country must put a cap on leverage, limit acceptable liquidity and funding practices, and have a resolution regime for winding up complex financial institutions.
The Davignon Plan imposed Europe-wide production and price controls, monitored and coordinated national governments’ state aids, organized the closures of outdated plants, encouraged mergers, and awarded EU funding to retraining schemes for redundant steel workers.
Can using US funding to reopen Iraqi state-owned enterprises get young men to abandon the insurgency and sectarian militias?
Most urgent, Haiti needs help funding its $2.2 billion ten-year National Cholera Elimination Plan.
While developing countries can finance more than 90% of what they need to ensure universal access to quality primary and secondary education, there is still a large funding gap – approaching $40 billion in 2020, and $90 billion by 2030 – that must be filled by international aid.
It makes no sense to have three multilateral institutions competing with one another for funding.
Theirworld was the first to campaign for funding for a pioneering double-shift system to educate Syrian refugee children, which has become hugely successful in Lebanon, Jordan, and increasingly in Turkey.
Hundreds of thousands of children have enrolled, and we are now working to unlock funding to enable a total of one million children across the Middle East to return to school by 2017.
But let’s hope that school funding for Syrian refugees is sorted out across Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, and wherever it is needed so that the planning needed to accommodate every child can start.
The communities where refugees reside are ready to make it happen; it is now time to unlock the funding they need.
Trump’s proposed budget would place restrictions on federal funding for clean-energy development and climate research.
How could this happen when, at least on paper, all problems had seemingly been resolved during May’s extraordinary EU summit meeting, which created a European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and ensured total funding of close to $1 trillion?
Instead, European funding will be used only to bail out governments, which in turn need the money to bail out their banks.
But, given the 20:1 liability-capital ratio in the banking sector, this approach implies that the funding requirements will become astronomical: compared to a €450 billion bill if potential losses remain undisclosed and dispersed, €9 trillion in debt guarantees would be needed to ensure the stability of the eurozone’s banking system.
In short, rigorous stress testing of eurozone banks (followed by mandatory recapitalization) would require much less public funding than would continuing to extend blanket guarantees to everybody.
They can ensure that the rules they have in place are consistent and favorable to funding investment projects with long maturities.
The new plan relies on a questionable mix of dubious financial-engineering gimmicks and vague promises of modest Asian funding.
For starters, member countries should demand that Interpol dedicate resources and funding to an urgent review of the thousands of alerts sitting on its system.
Still, a lack of funding for the prosecutor’s office is threatening to reverse its modest gains.
Microsoft will provide the cloud services, and a Who’s Who of tech investing is lined up to provide funding and advice.
Currently, funding for education in humanitarian crises, while rising nearly a full percentage point since last year, is still woefully insufficient.
The International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity – which I have the privilege to chair – has issued an urgent call for an increase in education funding to a level of 4-6% of total humanitarian assistance.
To be sure, such funds will always be an indispensable tool in both humanitarian and development efforts; but in today’s unpredictable environment, more flexible, long-term funding is critical.
“Core” funding, as it is known, enables the UN and nongovernmental organizations both to react more quickly in emergencies and to plan more strategically.
Such funding allows us to provide life-saving help when people need it most, rather than having to wait for countries to respond to specific humanitarian appeals.
Now that the world is working together on a new global development agenda, we hope this practice will spread and inspire other governments to move more toward high-quality funding for humanitarian relief and sustainable development.
But even if the most optimistic funding targets were met, we would still not have enough capital to ensure that all children are in school and learning.
This global group of leaders from government, business, academia, and civil society was brought together to brainstorm new funding mechanisms that could leverage existing commitments and motivate countries to increase their own spending on education.
BackNext