Funding
in sentence
2082 examples of Funding in a sentence
And, in today’s economic climate, attracting private financing is essential, because there is simply no way that public
funding
alone can close the infrastructure gap.
In this sense, France is paying the price for the lack of continuity, coherence, and appropriate
funding
given to social development policies over the past 30 years.
The current government under Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva misses the point with rhetoric about creating peace simply through promoting justice, or by
funding
large-scale socio-economic development projects.
This means that US groups, institutions, and even government agencies must begin sharing with – and sometimes even
funding
– Chinese companies and organizations.
Although research
funding
is rising, it accounts for just 4.7% of EU spending, compared to 31.7% for agriculture.
Second, Europe has failed to introduce an independent European Research Council to ensure that
funding
is allocated on the basis of scientific merit.
If only highly targeted research with guaranteed success is funded, the probability must be high that innovative researchers emigrate to countries or institutions that have a more generous and appropriate approach to the relationship between
funding
and success.
They would obtain timely warning of the existence of an H5N1 strain that is transmissible from human to human, but would focus the vast majority of their
funding
on parallel, low- and high-tech approaches – vaccines, drugs, and other public health measures – that would primarily benefit themselves.
In fact, for many economies, professional management of public assets could generate more revenues annually than corporate taxes, drastically increasing the amount of
funding
available for infrastructure investment.
When war or disaster strikes, the international community rightly mobilizes
funding
for food, shelter, and health care.
And it is my goal that by the end of the year we will also have a timetable to provide primary and secondary education to every child in the world – and the
funding
with which to achieve this most important of objectives.
The US National Science Foundation (NSF), whose primary mission is to support laboratory research across many disciplines, is
funding
a series of "citizens' technology forums," at which average, previously uninformed Americans come together to solve a thorny question of technology policy.
The second type of instrument is emergency
funding
to deal with unforeseen events, such as natural disasters, market breakdowns, and political instability.
Attention will inevitably be focused on the US to provide more material and technical support to the security forces; drips of
funding
for Central America under the term of the Mérida Initiative agreed with Mexico are welcome, but likely to be insufficient in the grand scheme of things.
Given its extraordinary shortfall of domestic saving, the US runs chronic current-account deficits and relies on foreign investors to fill the
funding
void.
The lesson is clear: while it is important to justify flagship scientific missions by what we expect to find,
funding
should be based mainly on their potential to lead to unexpected discoveries.
It would not be prudent for agencies to allocate all of their
funding
to high-risk research.
Such a
funding
scheme is essential for promoting breakthroughs in the long run, because it encourages researchers to take on risky projects with fundamentally unpredictable outcomes but potentially high gains.
For example, Morocco’s Ouarzazate Solar Power Plant and its Drinking Water Efficiency Program were launched with €37 million ($50.6 million) from the EU’s Neighborhood Investment Facility; these projects subsequently gained additional
funding
totaling more than €600 million.
Much more research
funding
is needed.
Meanwhile, as a result of the
funding
and high-tech components produced by pachinko money from Japan, North Korea’s weapons programs have become increasingly sophisticated.
And, with education and health care faltering and social security
funding
at risk, their kids, like Suleman’s, are now endangered partly because of their own choices.
Bonds of the DiasporaWASHINGTON, DC – The goals of the post-2015 development agenda cannot be achieved without strong programs and adequate
funding.
Virtually all (99%) occur in low- and middle-income countries, but most research and
funding
focuses on high-tech care for the 1% of deaths occurring in rich countries.
It is time for
funding
institutions to recognize that.
Indeed, the market signal is clear: At present, there is no shortage of
funding
available in most of the EU.
So a lack of
funding
is not the reason that investment remains weak.
The Juncker plan is supposed to unlock, with €21 billion in EU funding, projects worth 15 times as much (€315 billion).
As a result, even after Ebola had been declared a public health emergency and
funding
had been made available, it remained difficult for many weeks to direct resources where they were most needed.
Another is to decentralize direct
funding
through, say, tax credits.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Which
Countries
Would
Research
Government
Public
Should
Governments
Development
Banks
Could
Education
Billion
Support
Other
Global
Provide
Health
Projects