Example collocations logo

Funding in sentence

2082 examples of Funding in a sentence

What has America done with this opportunity – arguably the lowest-cost funding in the history of humankind?
For starters, it has withdrawn funding from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the UN agency that provides reproductive health-care and family-planning services for refugees and other women affected by humanitarian crises.
Moreover, the Trump administration has expanded the “Mexico City Policy,” also known as the “global gag rule,” which forbids organizations that receive US funding from providing information or referrals for abortion, even in countries where abortion is legal.
But in its current incarnation, the rule applies to all organizations that receive any type of US global health funding – a portfolio of $8.8 billion as of last year.
Nevertheless, Trump and congressional Republicans have taken steps to bar federal- and state-level funding for Planned Parenthood, an organization that provides vital health-care services to millions of pregnant women and mothers.
To understand the danger this poses to women, consider Texas, which slashed funding to Planned Parenthood in 2011 as part of an ideological campaign against contraception and abortion.
But the Polish parliament also rejected a bill that would have provided funding for emergency contraception, medical care, and sex education – the same types of services Planned Parenthood provides.
In the spirit of the occasion, everyone should consider how much more attention and funding maternal and women’s health would get if women were more equally represented in government.
But the funding for expanding these efforts will rest largely on provincial officials, who will be reluctant to compel local cadres to disrupt production and lay off even more workers.
A recent study of grant programs in Canada found that when referees are trained to recognize gender discrimination, funding outcomes naturally rebalance.
These grants are awarded on a competitive basis, and funding is contingent on achieving measurable outcomes.
But, despite ample funding and abundant media access, Asar finished third.
Despite pleas from the IMF and the OECD, Germany also remains implacably opposed to Eurobonds, which could ease the funding constraints of other eurozone members and bolster the resources of the European Stability Mechanism, which currently does not provide a credible firewall against a run on Spanish or Italian sovereign debt – or on the European banks that hold it.
Developed countries’ governments are laboring under the misapprehension that funding must come from their national budgets.
As a result, German banks have a lower cost of funding and – all else being equal – higher profitability.
The Greek authorities blame the EU for not providing funds, the EU blames Greece for not doing enough with available funds, and large NGOs are preoccupied with maintaining their own line of command and funding.
Unfortunately, these – indeed, all – CBA results are infused with the ideology of those funding and conducting them – and thus offer very limited information for public policy choice.
But Bild has already proven that it can do serious investigative work, such as exposing how Russia propped up the Donbas region’s economy after it broke away, paying salaries and pensions and funding job-creation efforts.
The danger with funding for lending is negative side effects.
The Bank of England has now corrected this by announcing that it will no longer provide funding for mortgages.
In addition, the upcoming asset-quality review and stress tests of the banks, if sufficiently rigorous, could provide assurances that banks receiving cheap ECB funding are adequately capitalized.
And it has remained in deficit ever since (with the exception of a temporary reprieve in the first two quarters of 1991 due to external funding of the Gulf War).
A “dynamic scoring” by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center suggests growth windfalls might prune the multiyear deficit from $1.4 trillion to $1.3 trillion over the next decade – hardly enough to finesse America’s intractable funding problem.
They can do so in a variety of ways, such as by investing in education, funding scientific and technological research, and building efficient infrastructure.
But, with funding costs for businesses trending up, this is finally starting to change.
Early this year, the State Council, China’s cabinet, made lowering funding costs for businesses, especially small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs), a top priority.
But, so far, efforts to lower funding costs have had a limited impact.
But it can avoid the pitfalls of such an approach by placing it within a broader, more comprehensive strategy that accounts for the underlying causes of the increase in funding costs for businesses.
The first factor driving up funding costs is the outsize profitability of China’s commercial banks – more than 23%, on average, for the top five last year – which account for some 35% of total profits earned by the 500 largest Chinese companies.
By reducing the amount of funding available to regular firms, especially SMEs, such activities drive up the average interest rate on loans.
BackNext