Fuels
in sentence
1107 examples of Fuels in a sentence
Rising energy bills, driven by the cost of fossil fuels, are a massive political issue in many countries in Europe and elsewhere, including the United States, where consumer energy prices have become a major issue in the run-up to this year’s presidential election.
Specifically, the Carbon Levy Project proposes a tax at the point of extraction for fossil
fuels.
And, by raising the cost of extracting fossil fuels, it would contribute to the eventual phase-out of a sector that has no place in a climate-safe world.
Human actions – burning fossil
fuels
– have already raised the carbon dioxide concentration higher than it has ever been in the last 500,000 years, and it is rising by about 0.5 % a year.
This also
fuels
opposition to government intervention, and to “stimulus” policies, which are supposedly redundant, if not harmful, since the events that require them cannot happen (but do).
The world’s energy infrastructure – finely tooled for the use of fossil
fuels
– is worth $55 trillion.
Asia’s Resource ScrambleNEW DELHI – Competition for strategic natural resources – including water, mineral ores, and fossil
fuels
– has always played a significant role in shaping the terms of the international economic and political order.
Faced with severe supply constraints, Asian economies are increasingly tapping other continents’ fossil fuels, mineral ores, and timber.
While Museveni and his cronies preside over what one American diplomat has called an “all-you-can-eat corruption buffet,” the West’s continued support for him prevents the region’s people from controlling their own destinies and
fuels
further crises.
Meanwhile, oil majors are keen to remind us that we will need to burn fossil
fuels
for many more years as we gradually shift to a new energy economy.
On the other side of the spectrum, oil-importing developed countries are most likely efficient users of fossil
fuels
already.
Attempting to do so only
fuels
further volatility (which is what really hurts growth).
For example, the World Bank claims that in order to be green, we need to take into account that consuming fossil
fuels
will deprive future generations of those resources.
In reality, burning fossil
fuels
over the past 150 years has enabled us to be free to create and innovate an amazingly richer world of antibiotics, telecommunications, and computers.
Moreover, as we have burned fossil fuels, we have simultaneously found new resources and discovered new methods, such as horizontal fracturing, which has dramatically increased the availability of natural gas while driving down its cost.
As for the US, a sharp hike in energy taxes on gasoline and other fossil
fuels
would not only help improve the government’s balance sheet, but it would also be a way to start addressing global warming.
The United States, for example, has created incentives for investment in alternative
fuels.
New technologies like lithium batteries and hydrogen cars promise to free us from dependence on fossil
fuels
without separating us from our cars, but even the most remarkable breakthroughs cannot replace our automotive fleet anytime soon.
On climate change, for example, we must embrace research and development to make green energy a genuinely cheaper alternative to fossil
fuels.
The scenarios set forth in the report indicate that if the world continues on its current track, burning more and more fossil
fuels
and increasing the levels of pollution in our atmosphere year after year, global average temperatures could rise by four degrees Celsius by the end of the century.
The New Climate EconomicsNEW YORK – This Friday, in its latest comprehensive assessment of the evidence on global warming, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will show that the world’s climate scientists are more certain than ever that human activity – largely combustion of fossil
fuels
– is causing temperatures and sea levels to rise.
And American voters, by a wide margin, favor a shift from fossil
fuels
to renewable energy.
It releases more CO2 per unit of energy than oil and gas, and it – and all the fossil
fuels
– is increasingly being outcompeted by wind, solar, hydropower, and other zero-carbon energy sources.
And if that narrative
fuels
a populist victory in March, reform of the banking sector will again be postponed, raising the eventual cost still further.
As all this extra stimulus
fuels
an economy already nearing full employment, inflation seems bound to accelerate, with protectionist trade tariffs and a possible “border tax” raising prices even more for imported goods.
But a closer look at the global energy system, together with a more refined understanding of the emissions challenge, reveals that fossil
fuels
will likely remain dominant throughout this century – meaning that carbon capture and storage (CCS) may well be the critical technology for mitigating climate change.
And, in the case of rapidly developing economies like China, renewable-energy deployment is not replacing fossil
fuels
at all; instead, renewables are supplementing a constrained fuel supply to facilitate faster economic growth.
This requires, first and foremost, recognizing that, while new energy technologies will eventually outperform fossil
fuels
both practically and economically, demand for fossil
fuels
to meet growing energy needs will underpin their extraction and use for decades to come.
Climate economists repeatedly have pointed out that such energy innovation is the most effective climate solution, because it is the surest way to drive the price of future green energy sources below that of fossil
fuels.
Demand for fossil
fuels
continued to grow, and so did competition for energy resources.
Back
Next
Related words
Energy
Which
Climate
Global
Burning
Other
Carbon
Power
Emissions
World
Their
Solar
Renewable
Would
Change
Countries
Sources
About
Economic
Electricity