Firms
in sentence
3712 examples of Firms in a sentence
Some
firms
pay a far higher rate than others.
Perhaps innovative
firms
that create jobs should be rewarded, in part, by a tax break.
The concern is that, after imposing a one-off levy on the untaxed profits that US
firms
hold abroad, introducing a territorial system would generate a tax loss.
So, even in the throes of a financial crisis, banks and non-financial
firms
can continue to borrow if their balance sheets are sound, uncontaminated by the “sovereign risk” of their state government.
The last set of proposals addresses a problem that has not been stressed enough: divergences within the eurozone reflect insufficient economic integration, for they would not have continued to widen if
firms
and workers had reacted more swiftly to price differences.
But within the US, the greatest risk is a sharp decline in asset prices, which would squeeze households and firms, leading to a collapse of aggregate demand.
But that only shows that Argentina’s private sector is investing what it saves, while Brazil’s private
firms
are deleveraging fast and investing very little, if at all.
Similarly, new partnerships with large industry incumbents – such as the tie-up between Daimler and Tesla and the controlling stake that Total took in SunPower – are reducing the cost of finance for smaller
firms.
Many in Britain know exactly what they want: to impose controls on the movement of workers from the rest of the EU, thereby protecting the domestic labor market, but without losing access to the single market or passporting rights, which allow British
firms
to sell their financial services on the continent.
He seems to think that Brazil, like some big firms, is simply "too large to fail."
As a result, American
firms
with access to cheap energy are given a big competitive advantage over
firms
in Europe and elsewhere.
Moreover, the dollar’s appreciation relative to other currencies has reduced import costs, putting competitive pressure on domestic
firms
to reduce prices.
Third, financial markets and financial
firms
have become a nexus of conflicts of interest that must be unwound.
These conflicts are inbuilt, because
firms
that engage in commercial banking, investment banking, proprietary trading, market making and dealing, insurance, asset management, private equity, hedge-fund activities, and other services are on every side of every deal (the recent case of Goldman Sachs was just the tip of the iceberg).
These shareholders are represented by institutional investors (pension funds, etc.) whose interests, agendas, and cozy relationships often align them more closely with firms’ CEOs and managers.
While Bill made business deals with some shady international figures, Hillary made a lot of her fortune by giving speeches to Wall Street firms, the main target of public wrath for causing the Great Recession of 2008.
A first “must” for an exporting superpower is to establish clear and stable trade arrangements with other countries, so that
firms
can produce goods and services collaboratively across borders.
Likewise, the UK government’s Brexit plans will disrupt the supply chains on which British
firms
depend.
Like its Brexit strategy, the government’s new exporting plan does not provide any clarity for British
firms.
Half of all British exports are to the EU, but many British
firms
are now questioning whether they will be able to continue production with their EU partners in the future.
In the US, for example, Goldman Sachs is advising investors to put their money in “domestic-facing”
firms
to weather the trade-war storm.
By demolishing the arrangements that provide British
firms
with seamless access to the world’s largest services market, and by closing itself off to immigration, the UK has embarked on a path of greater economic vulnerability, and lower-skill, lower-wage jobs.
Over the last 35 years, the US Department of Justice has established strong enforcement mechanisms, leading to enhanced compliance efforts by
firms.
While strict penalties may deter US-connected companies,
firms
without any link to a country with an enforcement regime can still trade bribes for contracts.
The US and others have made progress in punishing domestic
firms
that engage in corrupt practices abroad.
This situation is largely the result of predictable post-crisis economic dynamics, as
firms
and households in advanced countries repair their balance sheets.
But, rather than borrow to invest,
firms
cut investment to pay down debt, driving two decades of stagnation and deflation.
Profit is an incentive system that leads
firms
and individuals to respond to the information provided by prices.
One study found that in 2009, across a variety of industries in the US, intellectual capital – patents, copyrights, databases, brands, and organizational knowledge – held a 44% share of firms’ overall market value.
Developing countries have a lot to gain from attracting multinational
firms.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Financial
Which
Companies
Would
Private
Market
Workers
Other
Foreign
Large
Countries
Markets
Should
Government
While
Investment
Governments
Banks
Business