Example collocations logo

Federal in sentence

1805 examples of Federal in a sentence

here are the main two points i disagree with this film on: - the confederate states of America were called a confederacy because their chief concern was with states' rights over the federal government.
acting wasn't great,either,though i did like Ice-T,who plays a federal agent in the movie.the
In a plot seldom coherent, Theresa Russell, billed second, is cast as Alex Canis, A.K.A. "The Dove", an entrapment specialist employed by the National Security Agency (N.S.A.), who gathers her information through acts of prostitution, with a specialty as dominatrix, her clients being Federal government officials, and blackmail undoubtedly a goal for her unit, a "covert section" of the N.S.A. that collects photographs of her activities.
Arguably a tad better than the similar PURE LUCK, THE MAN features Sam Jackson as an federal agent who somehow ends up playing nursemaid to salesman Eugene Levy, as they pursue the bad guys who have killed Jackson's partner.
Its rise reflects the very low interest rates that have prevailed since the US Federal Reserve cut the federal funds interest rate to near zero in 2008.
First, the Fed is raising the short-term federal funds rate and projects that it will increase from a little over 2% to about 3.5% by the end of 2020.
But if a recession begins as soon as 2020, the Fed will not be in a position to reduce the federal funds rate significantly.
Indeed, the Fed now projects the federal funds rate at the end of 2020 to be less than 3.5%.
The Austrian Government will also support open access to archives in federal agencies and advocate a similar policy for non-governmental entities.
With the Congressional Budget Office projecting that federal budget deficits will average 4.2% of GDP from now until 2023, domestic saving will come under further pressure, fueling increased demand for surplus saving from abroad and even bigger trade deficits in order to fill the void.
When the government sought to prevent the case from being heard, the federal district court of Oregon issued a historic ruling that “the right to a climate system capable of sustaining human life is fundamental to a free and ordered society.”
The federal government would then augment the protection up to the once-in-five-hundred-year level.
Medicaid is the joint federal-state health-care program in which the federal government defines who is eligible, stipulates which benefits must be provided, and finances those benefits based on a formula whereby states with low average incomes receive a larger share of federal funding.
This was the main finding of a large “natural experiment” supported by the federal government.
Although the evidence indicates that the proposed cutbacks in federal dollars for Medicaid would not harm the physical health of those who lost their coverage, the reduction would force states to increase spending on their free-care programs.
The US is a large and powerful country and, when danger hits, investors buy up federal government debt – driving down interest rates.
So we must be talking about a scenario in which some part of the federal government, with or without express legislative approval, scrambles to provide an ad hoc loan in the range of tens or hundreds of billions of dollars, via a judge.
As an Australian citizen, I voted in the recent federal election there.
Madison thus advocated creating positions at the local, state, and federal levels, and in diverse social capacities, as well as ensuring incentives and opportunities for representatives to combine and reconcile different interests at all levels of public policymaking.
This European polity lacks the second crucial element of Madison’s scheme: diversified political representation at the federal level.
Meanwhile, the governor of California rejects the use of federal rescue funds to keep Mississippi’s banks afloat, while the secretary of the California Department of Finance declares that Mississippi voters must decide whether or not to keep the dollar.
Eventually, New York legislators would grudgingly vote to support Arizona, on the condition that Arizona implement a strict and humiliating austerity program, and California would begin to support federal programs that aim to stabilize the “dollar zone.”
These representatives know that their states are net winners of the union, ultimately benefiting from giving two dollars to some of the weaker states for every dollar that they pay in federal taxes.
Here the courts have repeatedly intervened, most recently within days of the election, when a federal district court halted work on the Keystone XL Pipeline, a project strongly opposed by environmentalists, on the grounds that the Trump administration had failed to present a “reasoned explanation” for its actions.
True, Trump will be able to continue appointing conservative federal judges and most likely win their confirmation in the Republican-majority Senate.
In the US, the two-day Federal Open Market Committee meeting on June 29-30 is likely to mark a major turning point, reversing the steady decline of the benchmark federal funds rate since Alan Greenspan began loosening monetary policy in 2001.
The first is simple incompetence: Bush and his inner circle simply do not understand the magnitude and importance of the federal government’s other fiscal problems.
The federal gas tax has been stuck at 18.4 cents a gallon since 1993, the lowest among advanced countries.
Likewise, the oil industry has often been able to drill on federal land and offshore without paying the full market rate for the leases.
The path toward a union based on joint liabilities, against the wishes of large parts of its population, is not leading to a federal state in the true sense of the term – that is, to an alliance of equals, who freely decide to unite and promise to protect each other.
BackNext