Expansion
in sentence
1789 examples of Expansion in a sentence
Governments will suffer, too, as their foreign debt – boosted by fiscal and monetary
expansion
that yielded little growth – becomes much more burdensome, while the export stimulus from lower exchange rates will be small, owing to the absence of new capacity outside the commodity sectors.
In closing the interview, he asserts that the
expansion
of his television channels abroad will be pivotal to the unification of Europe.
But this is a peculiar arrangement: a relatively poor country is helping to finance America’s War on Iraq, as well as a massive tax cut for the richest people in the world’s richest country, while huge needs at home imply ample room for
expansion
of both consumption and investment.
Finally, Palestinian negotiators must consider the consequences of using their most valuable bargaining chip – the ability to reject a perceived bad deal – in terms of its direct effect on Palestinians and the strong possibility of continued
expansion
of Jewish settlements on Palestinian lands.
The late Haider Abdel Shafi repeatedly stated one of the major problems in the Oslo Accords, namely that it didn’t secure the halt of settlement
expansion
in the interim period or if the final status talks failed.
The rapid
expansion
of trade in recent decades has given rise to a web of cross-border inter-dependencies in production and consumption.
From the late 1980s onward, low inflation was largely due to positive supply-side shocks – such as the Baby Boomer-fueled
expansion
of the labor force and the integration of many emerging countries into the global trading system.
The
expansion
of the ECB’s balance sheet and the targeted depreciation of the euro should help to bring the eurozone’s short-term inflation rate close to 2% and thus reduce deflationary risks.
Even America’s closest allies – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Israel – are vulnerable as they face the aggressive
expansion
of “radical forces” represented by Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, and the Iraqi resistance.
This is because most of the
expansion
is not the equivalent of a greater income for America’s poor in any reasonable sense, and because America gets relatively little value for its health-care financing.
On this reading, the
expansion
of America’s health-care programs has kept the properly measured material wellbeing of its poor on an upward path since 1979 at a rate not much less than that of real per capita GDP.
The Senate should reject NATO
expansion.
The scholar-diplomat George Kennan is correct in calling
expansion
the "most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era."
No reason cited in favor of
expansion
stands up to scrutiny.
Expansion
will not bolster democracy, because democracy is not threatened in the countries invited to join.
And why does
expansion
require billions of American tax dollars and an American nuclear guarantee?
But NATO
expansion
is worse than pointless; it is dangerous.
The prospect of NATO
expansion
caused Russia’s Duma to balk at approving the Start II treaty, which would cut the number of nuclear weapons aimed at North America.
But needlessly provoking Russia -- the direct and unavoidable consequence of
expansion
-- is a considerable cost that brings no benefits.
Excluding the Baltics, in particular, makes a mockery of
expansion.
NATO expansion, as planned, risks denying them the second without giving them the first.
The chief architect of expansion, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, has said that "we should not be in a hurry" to deal with Baltic membership.
Starting
expansion
without a plan for the Baltics is like taking off on a trans-Atlantic plane trip without landing gear, and the Clinton administration has no plan.
Economic costs to
expansion
also exist.
Ultimately,
expansion
risks adding Poland to the alliance and subtracting America.
Thanks to the wisdom of America’s founding fathers, the Clinton administration’s commitment to NATO
expansion
is not enough.
Two-thirds of the US Senate’s 100 members are needed, and 29 senators have already questioned the wisdom of
expansion.
A second response must be a dramatic
expansion
and redesign of workforce training programs.
But the power of US monetary authorities to engineer swings in nominal interest rates is incompatible with a stable world currency supporting a sustainable
expansion
of world trade and income.
Asian countries increased their dollar debts markedly during this period, as they experienced a strong
expansion
of investment and production.
Back
Related words
Economic
Fiscal
Growth
Monetary
Which
Would
Global
Countries
Economy
Credit
Their
Years
Rapid
Other
Financial
Trade
There
Investment
Government
While
