Example collocations logo

Exemptions in sentence

85 examples of Exemptions in a sentence

Now you may have seen in the news recently, they came through with us at the end of last month with a few special exemptions that will allow the Transition to be sold in the same category as SUVs and light trucks.
In addition to holding anywhere from two to six games – potentially over the course of a number of weeks – World Cup host cities are expected to throw a “fan fest,” furnish training facilities for the teams, and provide extensive tax exemptions for a range of activities.
Likewise, policymakers should be revamping incoherent and inconsistent tax structures that are riddled with unfair exemptions.
This implies that there is no need for ad hoc measures for young people, which merely risk overloading welfare systems with even more exemptions and special rules.
Remaining in the EU could mean retaining a “semi-detached” status, and perhaps seeking more exemptions and opt-outs from common rules – the course that Prime Minister David Cameron would seem to prefer.
More recently, Trump announced import tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum, and indicated that exemptions would be granted to US trade partners on a case-by-case basis.
Reaching this level will require broadening the tax base, streamlining exemptions, and strengthening the administration of value-added tax.
If equal opportunity for all is what is desired, a situation must be created whereby talented students from poor families receive, through stipends and tuition exemptions, a truly free education, including some funds for books and accommodation, while less talented students from well-to-do families pay the full cost of their studies.
“Streamlined" prospectuses and exemptions from some accounting standards for small companies have been tried before in individual countries – and have failed.
Exceptions and exemptions will be removed.
It doesn’t help that the Trump administration has refused to grant Japanese steelmakers exemptions from its threatened tariffs.
At the same time, the administration has declared that US manufacturers that use steel as an input may apply for tariff exemptions from the Department of Commerce if they are unable to source the specialized products they need domestically.
Trump would like to think that forcing quotas on exports and providing exemptions to domestic importers is good for the United States both politically and economically.
Beyond the obvious fallout from tariffs, the introduction of export quotas and exemptions will also have an insidious impact.
Tariff exemptions, too, can have a similarly damaging effect.
By the end of June, the Department of Commerce had already received 21,000 applications for exemptions, and it expects that number to double this year.Processing these applications takes time and introduces further complications, all the more so because companies seeking exemptions must apply separately for each type of steel (with the only difference sometimes being the component’s shape), and because exemptions must be renewed annually.
As of June 21, 9,000 of the initial 20,000 applications had been posted for review, 42 had won exemptions, and 56 had been rejected.
In this new age of protectionism, US firms that receive tariff exemptions and South Korean firms that receive quota entitlements will be gaining valuable property rights at little cost.
But by subjecting US manufacturers and the world to a system of tariffs, quotas, and exemptions, it will achieve the opposite effect: lower competition, higher prices, poorer service, and less innovation.
The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy in Delhi estimates that every year the Indian government doles out significantly more than that in implicit or explicit subsidies to better-off sections of the population, not to mention tax exemptions to the corporate sector.
The Republicans’ hegemony will enable easy agreement on tax cuts financed mainly by higher public borrowing, rather than by facing down special-interest lobbies’ resistance to the elimination of exemptions and loopholes.
The reason was simple: businesses benefit from tax exemptions or reductions for products that are exported.
Tax exemptions and deductions have been introduced in various sectors, and the value-added tax has also been significantly simplified to satisfy the need for an efficient, business-friendly bureaucracy.
Other financial players take on more risk because derivatives and repo players’ bankruptcy exemptions put them first.
Exemptions are based on medical conditions, and are given to university students and employees of certain organizations (for example, the police).
And governments have often faced vexing questions with regard to financial regulation and taxation of cooperatives, including treatment of profits and consideration of exemptions.
But energy-intensive industries usually benefit from exemptions on carbon charges.
Many observers believe that these exemptions hit the world’s financial system especially hard when Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008.
By most accounts, Lehman’s derivatives portfolio was a winner when it went bankrupt, but bankruptcy exemptions for derivatives allowed Lehman’s counterparties to close out their positions rapidly, in ways that were costly for Lehman, chaotic for financial markets, and damaging to the real economy.
At the same time, business owners seek illicit relationships with local officials to gain protection, privileges (such as contracts), loans, a blind eye to safety standards, and regulatory exemptions – activities that generate financial risks and undermine competition by raising entry barriers for more efficient enterprises.
Next