Empirical
in sentence
263 examples of Empirical in a sentence
Data2X, WomanStats, and Inclusive Security are just a few of the many organizations that have made it their mission to gather in global databases this kind of gender-differentiated data and research, providing irrefutable and
empirical
proof that women’s status is inextricably linked to state power, stability, corruption, prosperity, and many other indicators.
I was of course familiar with Piketty’s
empirical
work on income distribution, carried out jointly with Emmanuel Saez, Anthony Atkinson, and others.
But the book goes far beyond the
empirical
work, and narrates an intriguing cautionary tale about the dynamics of wealth under capitalism.
It has brought to public debate crucial
empirical
detail and a simple but useful analytical framework.
Much theoretical and
empirical
research demonstrates that opening trade can spur a country’s GDP growth.
The
empirical
evidence suggests that tax cuts are more likely than spending increases to spur growth, and that lower spending is more likely than tax hikes to consolidate budgets effectively.
The Price of Oil in 2015LONDON – In late 1979, I began work on my PhD thesis, an
empirical
investigation of the OPEC surplus and its disposal.
There is simply no theoretical or
empirical
basis for this, especially in countries like the US, where most investment (at the margin) is financed by debt and interest is tax deductible.
But, given thin
empirical
evidence and legitimate concerns about undermining trust in the effectiveness of government, and with so many options for the productive use of resources, this seems like a titanic ideological distraction.
In fact,
empirical
data suggest the significance of this danger.
Even in areas where the
empirical
record appears clear, closer analysis reveals major flaws.
Economists who become policy advisors are great fans of simplicity, uniformity, and arm's-length relations between government and the private sector, not because of economic theory or
empirical
evidence, but because of unexamined and untested assumptions.
So far, there is no hard
empirical
evidence that that is the case.
They have defended their
empirical
methods and insist that they are not the deficit hawks that their critics portray them to be.
Second,
empirical
evidence is rarely reliable enough to settle decisively a controversy characterized by deeply divided opinion.
But even in microeconomics, where it is sometimes possible to generate precise
empirical
estimates using randomization techniques, the results must be extrapolated in order to be applied in other settings.
So, too, on the other side, did Hans van Delden, a Dutch nursing home physician and bioethicist who for the past 20 years has been involved in all of the major
empirical
studies of end-of-life decisions in his country.
In this dispute, Smith comes down firmly on the side of van Delden and Battin, finding that “the
empirical
evidence gathered in the two jurisdictions does not support the hypothesis that physician-assisted death has imposed a particular risk to socially vulnerable populations.”
Indeed,
empirical
research has shown that, throughout history, as far back as the Standard Oil case in the early 20th century, most instances of alleged “predatory pricing” have in fact been cases of superior efficiency.
They made decisions on the basis of relevant normative and
empirical
factors.
But as
empirical
research prepared by the CEC5 National Banks estimates, its contribution to total price growth in the candidate countries is 1-2%.
But there is no
empirical
or theoretical evidence to support this claim.
While accepting the need for accountability, our best theory and
empirical
evidence must be used to guide practice.
As a rough
empirical
characterization of stylized facts, it was received somewhat skeptically by the academic community, and both authors were known for much more noted contributions.
Recent
empirical
work by three academic economists – David Autor (MIT), David Dorn (University of Zurich), and Gordon Hanson (UC-San Diego) – shows that the critics have a point (and then some).
In light of the new
empirical
findings, such nonchalance toward trade has become untenable.
After all, the social sciences historically offered
empirical
support and spiritual hope for just such reforms, which are increasingly dismissed as "utopian."
But
empirical
support for the benefits of capital-account liberalization is weak.
Empirical
falsification of a prevailing orthodoxy is disturbing.
It should start from the
empirical
observation that no economy has grown on a sustained basis without relying on markets and free exchange.
Back
Next
Related words
Evidence
Research
Studies
There
Support
Economic
Their
Growth
Which
Countries
Theoretical
Policy
Other
Analysis
Theory
Should
Based
Years
Trade
Suggests