Example collocations logo

Emissions in sentence

2828 examples of Emissions in a sentence

My wife gets fed up with me constantly trying to push emissions up her agenda."
It cuts fuel poverty, it cuts their bills, and it cuts carbon emissions at the same time.
And that is now what we're trying to do, and working with this large cities group to fight climate change, to negotiate huge, big, volume deals that will enable cities which generate 75 percent of the world's greenhouse gases, to drastically and quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a way that is good economics.
Environmentally, meat, amazingly, causes more emissions than all of transportation combined: cars, trains, planes, buses, boats, all of it.
So let's start just by looking at the CO2 emissions from the life cycle.
CO2e emissions are equivalent emissions of all the greenhouse gases and particles that cause warming and converted to CO2.
And if you look, wind and concentrated solar have the lowest CO2 emissions, if you look at the graph.
And the chart here shows the difference between the emissions from the regular grid, resulting if you use nuclear, or anything else, versus wind, CSP or photovoltaics.
So if you add these two together, alone, you can see a separation that nuclear puts out at least nine to 17 times more CO2 equivalent emissions than wind energy.
And so, on the right, you see gasoline emissions, the death rates of 2020.
Another action which was just taken independently by a shipping company itself was initiated because of concerns the shipping company had about greenhouse gas emissions with global warming.
The big opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is actually in urbanizing the suburbs.
And although they've been getting a lot of crap lately due to methane emissions and climate change, I hope that I can redeem their reputation in part by showing you how incredibly important they are in solving one of the world's biggest problems: food security.
This is what the U.K. government target on carbon and greenhouse emissions looks like.
Did we meet our three percent annual target on reducing carbon emissions?
You know, we do need the protected areas, absolutely, but for the sake of the oceans, we have to cap or limit CO2 emissions as soon as possible.
If China develops greater energy security and greater capacity to deal with its problems of carbon emissions, that's good for us as well as good for China as well as good for everybody else.
Buildings consume about 40 percent of our total energy demand, so tackling this consumption would significantly reduce our climate emissions.
There are people who are trying to get the right message across and there are things that can be done to reduce our impact, but we all need to reduce our toxic emissions, reduce our consumption of unnecessary goods and plant trees and gardens.
Somehow stalker tendencies turn into sweet nothings whispered into the ears of fourteen year old perverts in the middle of the most disturbing nocturnal emissions.
The largest solar emissions ever are detected and are about to set the whole damn world on fire.
Still, barring a breakthrough in United Nations negotiations in the near future and a reversal in current emissions trends, meeting that two-degree target is well-nigh impossible.
Climate science assumes that the global emissions peak must occur within the next several years.
One possibility is to establish “climate neutrality” as a long-term global objective – i.e., work to reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to zero.
This type of bottom-up approach would lead to significant reductions in emissions.
Instead, the paper should inspire – and, indeed, calls for – more immediate, deliberate, and aggressive action to ensure that greenhouse-gas emissions peak within a few years and net-zero emissions are achieved by mid-century.
Global emissions would need to be reduced by 4-6% every year, until they reached zero.
Our emissions are already among the world’s smallest, but our climate targets are the world’s most ambitious.
Nowhere is this more apparent than in the debate over the need to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in order to avoid dangerous climate change.
China and the United States are the two largest GHG emitters, and it seems unlikely that any global agreement to reduce emissions will be effective unless both participate.
BackNext