Example collocations logo

Emissions in sentence

2828 examples of Emissions in a sentence

Under the current rules of global trade, countries have a strong incentive to free ride off the emissions reductions of other nations, instead of strengthening their own programs.
This would discourage carbon emissions in every single economic transaction, every day of the year.
Our plan would achieve nearly twice the emissions reductions of all Obama-era climate regulations combined, and nearly three times the new baseline after President Trump repeals all of those regulations.
Our plan by itself would meet the high end of America's commitment under the Paris Climate Agreement, and as you can see, the emissions reductions would continue over time.
China is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but what its leaders care even more about is transitioning their economy to consumer-led economic development.
We see this problem in many places: in the difficulty of managing overfishing, or in reducing carbon emissions to mitigate climate change.
We developed the model for the state of California so they could get on with reducing carbon emissions.
From there, the salt circulates to a storage tank underground, where it produces steam, which spins turbines and generates enough electricity to power 70,000 homes and offsets 30,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions every year.
But on the other side, you see this very interesting triangular, black-colored swatch, that is produced by the same residual particulate waste created by the emissions of the generator.
When Montreal was signed, we were less certain then of the risks from CFCs than we are now of the risks from greenhouse gas emissions.
Drawing down emissions depends on rising up.
This connection comes to light in three key areas, three areas where we can secure the rights of women and girls, shore up resilience and avert emissions at the same time.
Unfortunately, forests are often cleared to supply it, and that causes emissions from deforestation.
Project Drawdown estimates that addressing inequity in agriculture could prevent two billion tons of emissions between now and 2050.
It can also mean lower emissions.
It could dramatically reduce demand for food, transportation, electricity, buildings, goods and all the rest, thereby reducing emissions.
According to Project Drawdown, one billion fewer people could mean we avoid nearly 120 billion tons of emissions.
I don't understand that, because if the emissions have to stop, then we must stop the emissions.
Rich countries like Sweden need to start reducing emissions by at least 15 percent every year.
But we can only imagine what that means for reducing emissions.
That means that rich countries need to get down to zero emissions within 6 to 12 years, with today's emission speed.
So, why are we not reducing our emissions?
If there really was a crisis, and if this crisis was caused by our emissions, you would at least see some signs.
Because if it would have, the emissions would have gone down by now.
(Applause and cheers) Thank you, thank you. (Applause and cheers) To avoid dangerous climate change, we're going to need to cut emissions rapidly.
We need to not only cut emissions extremely rapidly, we also need to take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.
At the moment, power generation is responsible for about a quarter of all carbon dioxide emissions.
Hypothetically, if you replaced all power generation with this process, then you would not only eliminate all of the emissions from power generation but you would start removing emissions from other sectors as well, potentially cutting 60 percent of overall carbon emissions.
Does talk of curing climate change undermine the will to cut emissions?
This is a real concern, so we need to emphasize the paramount importance of reducing emissions and how speculative these ideas are.
BackNext