Example collocations logo

Emission in sentence

182 examples of Emission in a sentence

A hot gas is producing emission lines only, no continuum.
If you like more of the sexual and bodily humor there is emission impossible (VOL.2
"Santa Claus" also makes Keith Richards' worst flashbacks look like my first nocturnal emission.
The science-based approach of translating a global temperature cap into precise national emission budgets is politically unfeasible.
Different principles of fairness will generate different emission distributions for each population and different “carbon Gini coefficients.”
We have selected three widely discussed methods of allocating GHG emission quotas to different countries:The equal per capita emission rights approach allocates emission rights to countries in proportion to their population, but only for the remaining portion of the global “carbon budget” – that is, for the amount that can still be emitted, between now and 2050, without causing dangerous, irreversible climate change.
The equal per capita cumulative emission approach seeks equality over time.
The grandfathering approach bases emission rights on existing patterns.
It thus leads to a carbon Gini coefficient of 0.The first approach – equal per capita emission rights from now on – results in a carbon Gini coefficient of about 0.4.
With this as our starting point, it is clear that a narrow focus on short-term carbon emission cuts is flawed.
For example, unlike the World Trade Organization, whose dispute-settlement mechanism imposes penalties for abandoning negotiated reductions of trade barriers, the targets for emission reductions are not binding and enforceable commitments.
But there are persuasive reasons why these countries insist that the obligations must instead reflect per capita emissions, a criterion that would require far greater emission cuts by the US than its leaders now contemplate.
A clear commitment to emission reduction targets in the developed and developing world to drive technology investment and energy efficiency measures.
In industrial sectors such as steel, cement, and chemicals, we need carbon prices to unleash a market-driven search for least-cost emission reductions.
His orders would rescind the Clean Power Plan regulations of the US Environmental Protection Agency; roll back standards to control methane releases from oil and gas production and distribution; and end the regulatory use of a “social cost of carbon,” introduced by the EPA to calibrate the dollar value of climate damage caused by the emission of an additional ton of carbon dioxide.
The tariff proposal – contained in the central piece of global warming legislation now before Congress – would impose emission controls on domestic industries starting in 2012.
Brazil’s efforts have led to perhaps the biggest emission reduction of any country in the world – at a time when deforestation accounts for around 15% of global greenhouse-gas emissions.
Earlier conferences of the UNFCCC signatories sought to reach legally binding agreements on emission reductions, at least for the industrialized countries that have produced most of the greenhouse gases now in the atmosphere.
This implies great scope for emission reductions, and in ways that would have a smaller impact on our lives than ceasing all fossil-fuel use.
First, that emission count is already 20% too high compared to today’s reality.
Such a reversal would reduce hunger, poverty, and malnutrition; help protect our planet’s natural resources; and slow the emission of greenhouse gases from agriculture.
And politicians would have an opportunity to control the number and distribution of emission permits and the flow of billions of dollars in subsidies and sweeteners.
The biggest emitters of the twenty-first century, including India and China, are unwilling to sign up to tough, costly emission targets.
Its containment requires changing habits and investing in emission reductions so that future generations will have a habitable planet.
For Non-KP developed countries, they should undertake comparable commitments with quantified emission reduction targets.
The best way to implement this strategy is to use a “carbon credit trading system” in the advanced countries, with each advanced country receiving a certain amount of carbon credits to determine its permissible emission levels.
As a result, mitigation would become more efficient, and the same expenditures by advanced countries would produce higher global emission reductions.
This would provide them with an incentive even before that point to make decisions concerning energy pricing and efficiency that would reduce the growth of their emissions without impeding economic growth, and thus extend the period during which their emission levels remain unrestricted.
And make no mistake about it: the EU’s unilateral emission restrictions are not only economically destructive – likely to cost Europe an estimated $250 billion a year by 2020 – but are also astonishingly ineffective.
China recently demanded that the US reduce its emissions by 40% from its 1990 baseline levels and subsidize emission reduction efforts in China and other developing countries to the tune of .05-1% of America’s GDP.
BackNext