Example collocations logo

Dispute in sentence

741 examples of Dispute in a sentence

Indeed, Santos and Uribe, members of the same political party and once close allies, are now embroiled in a bitter dispute, with Uribe emerging as Santos’s most visible opponent.
And then there are its members’ bilateral disagreements, including a heated territorial dispute between India and China.
Recently, the two countries signed an agreement that seemed to put an end to their long border dispute.
Thus, the settling of the border dispute with Russia was not aimed so much at building a geopolitical marriage as securing each other’s rear, offering both sides a free hand to explore opportunities elsewhere.
What had seemed a bilateral dispute between the United States and China over the renminbi’s exchange rate has mutated into a general controversy over capital flows and currencies.
The controversy over China’s exchange-rate policy thus is no mere bilateral US-China trade dispute, but rather a global macroeconomic clash between advanced and emerging countries.
Worse yet, failure would strengthen those on both sides of the dispute who argue that diplomacy is a waste of time.
LONDON – The conventional wisdom regarding the recent plunge in the price of oil is that we are seeing a repeat of the 1985-1986 collapse, when Saudi Arabia ramped up production as part of a dispute with other members of the OPEC cartel.
Hence the fierce (albeit arcane and polite) dispute between the two sides at the International Monetary Fund’s recent meeting in Lima, Peru.
South Korea and Japan – both important players in the global economy and close US partners – are under immediate threat, whereas China and Russia, North Korea’s two northern neighbors, are global nuclear powers with their own interests in the dispute.
The essential defect of the NPT is now visible in the nuclear dispute between Iran and the United Nations Security Council: the Treaty permits the development of all nuclear components indispensable for military use – particularly uranium enrichment – so long as there is no outright nuclear weapons program.
He and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu signed a joint declaration ending the dispute between their countries; and the Polish government purchased full-page ads in major newspapers around the world – including the three largest Israeli dailies – to promote the text of the statement.
Greece has always promised to veto Macedonian membership, owing to a dispute over the country’s name.
This would be a major loss: the WTO’s dispute settlement process is essential to rules-based global trade.
And nothing makes them more anxious than their fear that a regional dispute might, if not brought to an end quickly, steamroll into national disintegration.
Few serious commentators now dispute the science.
The division of the Korean Peninsula, the India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir, and the question of Taiwan (which by 2020 the US will no longer be able to defend from a Chinese attack, according to a 2009 study by the RAND Corporation) appear as intractable as the Israeli-Palestinian dispute.
In fact, European leaders are finally beginning to reveal the true nature of the ongoing debt dispute, and the answer is not pleasant: it is about power and democracy much more than money and economics.
In fact, French-American relations have already begun to improve, as both sides realized that their pubic dispute was damaging their interests.
This time, though, at least on one side, the dispute is more transparently about geopolitical power, not ideology.
The dispute with Macedonia goes back to the early 1990’s, when Yugoslavia collapsed into independent states.
It sounds ridiculous, but there is another, often overlooked, aspect to the dispute: by behaving as it has, Greece is demonstrating a lack of confidence in its NATO partners.
The first challenge that Gligorov faced was a dispute with neighboring Greece over the so-called “name issue.”
Given these dynamics, if the dispute over the THAAD system escalates into a full-fledged trade war, both China and South Korea will suffer.
In this context, South Korea’s move to involve the WTO – and the risk to China’s international reputation that a formal dispute would imply – may have focused Chinese leaders’ minds concerning the risks of escalation.
Rather than imposing sweeping tariffs, it could tailor its actions to the intellectual-property dispute.
They would prefer to clinch deals with partners one by one, without being bound by the obligation to apply liberalization measures across the board and without being forced to abide by the rulings of the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism.
The facts are hard to dispute; indeed, the historical record is now so stark that diehard Republicans are probably starting to wonder if there is a curse.
Trump’s Protectionist Threat to Latin AmericaWASHINGTON, DC – Despite many dire predictions, the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China has not resulted in a global economic downturn.
Although the Sino-American trade dispute has not significantly affected economic growth in either country, if either economy did slow, Latin American countries would certainly suffer.
BackNext