Example collocations logo

Disinformation in sentence

161 examples of Disinformation in a sentence

But that enables the spread of disinformation; that facilitates polarization.
And with this illegal cash, "Vote Leave" unleashed a fire hose of disinformation.
Because the most effective disinformation has always been that which has a kernel of truth to it.
What we now know is that this account, Texas Lone Star, was part of a wider Russian disinformation campaign, one that has since been taken down.
Because we actually know very little about the long-term consequences of hate and disinformation on people's attitudes and behaviors.
Two puppets are assigned to fabricate a personality and background for an unidentified corpse that is to be used in a disinformation mission in the closing days of WWII.
While I believe in freedom of speech, they way they spread hatred, lies, disinformation, and such fantastic ideas is beyond all limits.
The movie presents disingenuous and unwarranted disinformation.
Was their a sinister motive like CIA disinformation or just an attempt to slay the audience with peals of laughter?
Result of this disinformation was the capture Turkish armies of the unprotected Plevna.
Better yet, they then trained hundreds more people to detect disinformation, thus multiplying the initiative’s overall impact.
It is certainly in Putin’s character to purloin secrets and create disinformation; he was a KGB operative, after all.
It should, at least, begin to respond to the Kremlin’s shrewd and highly professional disinformation strategy with far more clarity and candor.
Equally important is the development of norms regarding privacy and security regarding encryption, back doors, and the removal of child pornography, hate speech, disinformation, and terrorist threats.
According to Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), which is leading the country’s efforts to counter foreign-influence operations, such interference is very likely, and citizens should be on the lookout for disinformation and fake news.
These ongoing measures are a response to the weaponization of social-media platforms by illiberal state intelligence agencies and extremist groups seeking to divide Western societies with hate speech and disinformation.
Hostile powers have turned our open Internet into a cesspool of disinformation, much of which is spread by automated bots that the major platforms could purge without undermining open debate – that is, if they had the will to do so.
And we have seen the Arab media foster a mature debate about democracy, constitutionalism, and the role of Islam in the modern state, rather than dispensing disinformation and crass propaganda.
But from the moment when she solemnly assured the world that she had seen nothing in Sittwe, that nothing had happened in the rest of Rakhine State, and that the string of alarming reports to the contrary was just the “tip of an iceberg of disinformation,” her Nobel Prize became an alibi.
In recent years, much attention has been devoted to “fake news” – outright disinformation that spreads widely, often through social media or other online platforms.
But it is also an analytical term that describes deliberate disinformation presented in the form of a conventional news report.
Such efforts include automated programs to find and remove fake accounts; featuring Facebook pages that spread disinformation less prominently than in the past; issuing a transparency report on the number of false accounts removed; verifying the nationality of those who place political advertisements; hiring 10,000 additional people to work on security; and improving coordination with law enforcement and other companies to address suspicious activity.
Experience from European elections suggests that investigative journalism and alerting the public in advance can help inoculate voters against disinformation campaigns.
China has waged its psywar against India largely through disinformation campaigns and media manipulation, aimed at presenting India – a raucous democracy with poor public diplomacy – as the aggressor and China as the aggrieved party.
The right place to start to address it is by creating a better balance between education and commercial disinformation.
The proliferation of “bots” – computer programs that automatically spread disinformation – has blurred these lines further.
So long as social media companies optimize for advertising revenue, their algorithms will tend to reward the extremes, and news organizations will waste valuable resources battling disinformation.
Though Facebook and many other digital giants have signed on to a European Commission “code of conduct” on policing hate speech and disinformation, much more needs to be done.
Moreover, the EU urgently needs to develop a robust mechanism for tracking and analyzing Russian disinformation campaigns across all member states and in every language.
With the right strategy in place, we can prevent social-media platforms from serving as accelerants of disinformation, by identifying and stopping propaganda campaigns as soon as they emerge.
Next