Example collocations logo

Decisions in sentence

2964 examples of Decisions in a sentence

The economic case for a European globalization fund is that trade policy has been delegated to the European level, while Union members retain control rights to block decisions.
And, to ensure fairness, it seeks the restoration of the GST Disputes Settlement Authority provided for in the original bill, so that the GST council administering the tax would not rule on its own decisions.
In addition, as Fink and others have warned, compensation practices that link top executives’ pay to measures of short-term success like quarterly earnings per share or annual equity performance also encourage “short-termism” in corporate investment decisions.
Many of life’s most important decisions are ultimately blind leaps, and accepted solutions often turn out to be wrong.
Today, enormous power is concentrated in the hands of the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee, which sets interest rates and regulates the money supply behind closed doors – decisions that are not subject to review or challenge.
As it stands, US lawmakers routinely delegate technical issues to experts; but, given the hazards of these experts’ often-unwarranted certitude and insulation from popular opinion, lawmakers wisely retain authority over important decisions.
While such a system would reduce the Fed’s independence, it would put the onus of difficult political decisions where it belongs: on the democratically elected members of Congress.
When credit decisions, public procurement, construction contracts, and price determination reflect only short-term and purely political goals, good economic performance becomes impossible – even in countries with large natural-resource endowments.
Understanding the increased importance of fiscal policy is complicated by confusion over how various euro-zone governments actually make policy decisions – a process that relies on an ever-changing, complex mix of opaque institutional factors and domestic political dynamics that vary considerably from one country to another.
The absence of a stable framework will force investors to re-think asset-allocation decisions and risk pricing.
It is only faith in the idea that our lives matter, and that our decisions must be judged by their moral content, that we in Ukraine, and elsewhere, will be able to find our way out of the misery, unhappiness, and despair that has consumed us over the last two years.
For membership in NATO brings with it the right to participate in the deliberations and decisions of the Atlantic Alliance.
First, the political and economic decisions that leaders across Europe now face are anything but independent.
The necessary decisions in Paris, Berlin, London, and Brussels are not just a random coin toss.
There are strong incentives for voters and political leaders in all democratic countries to take decisions that support economic prosperity and political stability, once it becomes obvious that all the alternatives are economically damaging or politically dangerous.
Decisions about how to expand services could be guided by the Lancet commission’s core indicators on “preparedness,” “delivery,” and “impact” of surgical care.
Uncertainties about the economy are likely to insert an element of caution into companies’ investment decisions.
Decrying a new legal imperialism, they ask why foreign prosecutors should make critical decisions about justice concerning countries with which they have no personal connection.
Decisions made during US President George W. Bush’s two terms in office offer an illuminating contrast.
By extension, one solution to the global problem would be for all of humanity to be ruled by a universal government, accountable to its constituents, and endowed with the authority to enforce its decisions.
But while this new arrangement certainly has its advantages, it also has potential pitfalls, because far-reaching decisions could go unquestioned and unchallenged.
With Big Tech’s secret algorithms determining how we perceive the world, it is becoming increasingly difficult for people to make conscious decisions – what philosophers perceive as the basic dimension of free will.
Yet, at a time when attention is supplanting money as the most valuable commodity, the impact of their decisions is far-reaching.
Progress in reforming the international financial system is also disfigured by the fact that developing countries, most particularly those in Latin America, have not been allowed to participate sufficiently in the key discussions and institutions where decisions are made.
While India’s president may be only a ceremonial head of state, during periods of political instability – especially in the current age of coalition governments – it is the president who makes crucial decisions about governing parties.
Both decisions acknowledge that the current rules of the international economic game reflect the interests of the advanced industrial countries – especially of their big corporations – more than the interests of the developing world.
Although the Fed assesses many approaches and indicators in making its decisions, there is no doubt that it was heavily influenced by mainstream academic thinking – including the so-called real business cycle models and New Keynesian models – which assumed that financial markets operate flawlessly.
In many countries, inadequate local water availability is increasingly constraining decisions about where to set up new manufacturing facilities and energy plants.
There is a deep disconnect in American politics between scientific knowledge and political decisions.
But AIPAC’s supposed ability to control US policy decisions is a Potemkin village myth, cultivated by friends and rivals alike.
BackNext