Cutting
in sentence
1347 examples of Cutting in a sentence
China pays $38 per ton of CO2 avoided with wind power, for example, while the US pays around $600 for
cutting
a ton of CO2 with biofuels.
That means that food production moves elsewhere, often to farmland created by
cutting
down forests, which releases more CO2 and damages biodiversity.
Rather than relying on
cutting
a few tons of incredibly overpriced CO2 now, we need to invest in research and development aimed at innovating down the cost of green energy in the long run, so that everyone will switch.
The Chinese government has promised for years to reduce excess steel capacity, thereby
cutting
the surplus output that is sold to the United States at subsidized prices.
Ireland, the European country with the highest rate of growth is also the one that most reduced its deficit and public debt by
cutting
expenditures and taxes.
For example: we no longer hear about
cutting
Italy's public debt in half (in relation to GDP).
But the way to minimize the pain is to cut spending without
cutting
output, which requires selling to others what residents can no longer afford.
But, as many other well-meaning cities and countries have discovered,
cutting
CO2 significantly is more difficult than it seems, and may require quite a bit of creative accounting.
More surprisingly, Copenhagen’s politicians have confidently declared that
cutting
CO2 now will ultimately make the city and its citizens wealthier, with today’s expensive green-energy investments more than paying off when fossil-fuel prices rise.
And
cutting
pensions and health care for the elderly certainly qualifies as extreme – as well as completely inappropriate and unnecessary.
Instead of hearing more lectures from the IMF about
cutting
budgets, poor countries need larger budgets to pay for the required investments - roads, power supplies, ports, schools, and health clinics - to jump-start economic growth.
American critics, meanwhile, saw the Euro area as overly cautious for
cutting
interest rates slowly and maintaining the fiscal constraints of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Cutting
growth rates by 40-70% is surely a recipe for stagnant societies with insufficient growth to satisfy private wants and public needs.
But if EU leaders impose high costs on the UK – namely, by restricting its access to the single market – Europe could end up
cutting
off its nose to spite its face.
Between now and the midterms, they can brag about
cutting
taxes on most households.
In addition to adapting to climate change, the world must also reduce future risks to the planet by
cutting
back on emissions of greenhouse gases, which are the source of man-made climate change.
Rightly so: without a strong policy response aimed at building a more inclusive growth model, rising populism and economic nationalism will impair the functioning of markets and overall macroeconomic stability – potentially
cutting
short the current global recovery.
The ECB has since taken the short-term interest rate into negative territory,
cutting
it from 0.2% in August 2014 to -0.3% now.
Moreover, the Federal Reserve will be cautious in
cutting
interest rates when the dollar is falling, the economy is near full employment, and higher energy prices are working their way through the economy.
This debate is at the
cutting
edge of today’s globalization, yet it is clouded by a healthy dose of national self-interest.
If investment in clean energy can be raised to at least $1 trillion per year by 2030, it will be possible to provide energy access to those most in need while
cutting
annual carbon-dioxide emissions by 5.5-7.5 gigatons – roughly what the United States emits in a year today.
So
cutting
interest rates would not only be stupid—it would be crazy.
Some critics worry about corruption in the corruption agenda itself: that the fight will be used as a “cover” for
cutting
aid to countries that displease the US administration.
The Adaptation ImperativeNAIROBI – In the run-up to the recent United Nations meeting on climate change in Lima, Peru, much of the world’s attention focused on how strongly countries would commit to a framework for
cutting
greenhouse-gas emissions.
We are also working to improve the business environment and investment climate by
cutting
red tape and simplifying the administrative burden on foreign investors.
The Republic candidate, Donald Trump, favors the opposite policies:
cutting
taxes for the rich, keeping wages low, and rolling back health-care reforms.
Recent studies by the IMF and others suggest that raising taxes,
cutting
subsidies, and reducing government spending – even inefficient spending – would stifle growth in the short term, exacerbating the underlying debt problem.
New McKinsey Global Institute research finds that three digital forces – disintermediation
(cutting
out the middle man), disaggregation (separating processes into component parts), and dematerialization (shifting from physical to electronic form) – could account for (or create) 10-45% of the industry revenue pool by 2030.
Mobilizing resources for these programs depends on
cutting
wasteful programs and rooting out corruption in our bureaucracy.
It will most likely continue to do so until we stop it by
cutting
CO2 emissions.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
Which
Their
Emissions
Taxes
Spending
While
Rates
Other
Government
Could
There
Should
Countries
About
Interest
Growth
Raising
Global
Through