Example collocations logo

Consumers in sentence

1831 examples of Consumers in a sentence

China’s e-commerce revolution enables the country’s consumers to decide where to put their money.
Whatever challenges emerge, the fact is that a prosperous China, underpinned by local consumers, will contribute to – and shape – a prosperous global economy.
A risk-based approach supervising individual firms can be adopted by a single regulator, with resources allocated not only across firms but also across sectors on the basis of the likelihood of problems arising and of the impact on consumers and on market confidence if problems emerge.
The FSA's four statutory objectives are to maintain confidence in the financial system; to promote public understanding of the financial system; to secure the appropriate degree of protection for consumers; and to reduce as far as possible the chances of a financial services firm being used for criminal purposes.
Legalizing and regulating marijuana will not only help to protect consumers from such life-altering penalties; it will also reduce the incentives for violence associated with black markets that are common in US cities and narcotics-producing countries.
Consumers have better access to credit.
Having already surged on account of Iran-related geopolitical concerns, they are altering American consumers’ behavior, weakening their confidence, aggravating the country’s payments imbalances, and further reducing policymakers’ flexibility.
The extension of tax credits for renewable-energy producers and consumers would go a long way toward advancing this goal.
Another factor working in Africa’s favor is its private companies’ and consumers’ low dependence on borrowed money.
Populist rhetoric notwithstanding, there is strong evidence to suggest that trade boosts incomes and living standards, by increasing productivity and reducing prices for firms and consumers.
Productivity improvements, by lowering costs, allow firms to pay their workers and suppliers better, reduce prices for consumers, pay more in taxes, and still make more money for their shareholders.
And as the cost of existing goods falls, consumers will have more money to spend on more of the same goods or different ones.
Spending cuts, he argues, would restore credibility to Britain’s public finances, thereby quelling the anxieties of businesses, investors, and consumers about future tax increases and inflation.
Capitalism is unique in stimulating entrepreneurs to dream up new commercial ideas and develop them for the market, and generating excitement for consumers in discovering the new.
It means consumers who don’t want to be protected; who want to make their own choices.
Starbucks, like all merchants, pays those fees, which are not fully transparent to consumers – but which of course add to the cost of a cup of coffee.
Retail consumers do not usually think about an entity such as ICE.
Many of these rules, such as those to protect consumers, make sense; but the overall result is to protect incumbents – banks and credit card companies – against competitive pressure.
Still, the chances are high that consumers will gain from this latest innovation – and that there will be positive spillover effects in other areas of finance, as it becomes easier to bypass establishment payment mechanisms.
Tariffs would immediately hurt American consumers, and defensive, retaliatory responses from other countries could fatally undermine already feeble world trade, thus choking off a critical source of global prosperity.
The “info-monopolists” Google and Facebook, faced with few regulatory obstacles, have created unprecedented value for consumers – and have secured massive market power for themselves.
Unlike television networks or newspapers, these digital behemoths don’t merely give advertisers an audience; they tailor ads to individual consumers.
Understandably fixated on balance-sheet repair, US consumers have not taken the bait from their monetary and fiscal authorities.
As with Europe’s new carbon trading, all producers and consumers around the globe will need to face market incentives to adopt technologies and consumption patterns that slow (and eventually stop) the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
But there often are serious costs as well: higher prices for consumers, the dampening effect on further innovation of reducing access to knowledge, and, in the case of life-saving drugs, death for all who are unable to afford the innovation that could have saved them.
When deflationary expectations are entrenched, as they are in Europe today, consumers and investors delay spending on the ground that prices and costs will be lower tomorrow.
Computers can unearth these patterns, some of which seem to defy explanation, thereby enabling marketers to target consumers much more effectively.
Just as consumers can rate products, parents and students should be able to rate and provide feedback on the performance of individual teachers.
These include reducing fast-food portions, restricting food and beverage advertising, providing consumers (especially parents) with better nutrition information, reformulating processed foods, requiring more exercise at school, and ensuring balanced, varied, and healthy meals at school and workplaces.
That will leave US importers to pay the tariffs and pass on the cost to US consumers (further fueling inflation) or to US shareholders through lower profits.
Back