Example collocations logo

Consumers in sentence

1831 examples of Consumers in a sentence

In rich economies, consumers spend the bulk of their income on services such as health, education, transportation, housing, and retail goods.
Consumers today are not holding back on spending because they expect goods and services to become cheaper, as one would expect during a period of deflation.
Breaking the distorting power of these criminal networks requires first confronting the distortions that perpetuate it: the failed war on drugs and criminalization of consumers; the burgeoning privatization of security; police agencies that reproduce, rather than reduce, violence and crime; prisons that hone offenders’ criminal skills; and judicial systems that re-victimize crime victims.
But let’s assume that Trump is right – that China is still selling its products to US consumers at a loss.
Even the most robust economies have a surplus of ideas that never reach consumers.
From companies exploiting weak enforcement of rules to countries hiding behind short-term definitions of national interests to consumers letting supermarkets get away with unsustainable purchasing, we need a renewed debate on the future of our oceans and the life that they support.
But will the downturn also produce a deeper shift in the values of consumers?
But does this mark an enduring change in values, or just a temporary reduction, forced upon consumers by investment losses and greater economic uncertainty?
Sharper regional disparities in the availability and cost of capital could emerge, particularly for smaller businesses and consumers, constraining investment and growth in some countries.
Progress on this front would enable equity and bond markets to provide an important alternative to bank lending for the largest companies – and free up capital for banks to lend to SMEs and consumers.
Much of the increased cost will be carried over to consumers.
As US manufacturers’ costs rise above those of their overseas competitors, American consumers will also face higher prices.
The financial markets encouraged consumers to borrow by introducing ever more sophisticated instruments and more generous terms.
It is little wonder that only 15% of consumers shop online across European borders.
A regulatory regime that gave unfair advantages to local businesses would hurt consumers, hamper innovation, and damage competitiveness.
European policymakers should also guarantee non-discriminatory wholesale access to communications networks, and that consumers and businesses have a range of choices for telecommunications and online services.
The problem for regulators is that standard anti-monopoly frameworks do not apply in a world where the costs to consumers (mainly in the form of data and privacy) are thoroughly non-transparent.
The European Union’s new General Data Protection Regulation now requires firms to allow consumers – albeit only those in the EU – to port their data.
Whereas the practicality of this remains to be seen, surely individual consumers should have a right to know which data of theirs is being collected and how it is being used.
They want Chinese consumers to buy their products.
Countries, citizens, users, consumers, producers, workers, entrepreneurs, professionals cannot be left out of the decisions that hold significant consequences for their lives and goals, indeed for the very values of society.
Consumers need to have confidence in the safety of the products they purchase, whether produced at home or abroad.
And it will certainly be a boon for consumers, as the price of their beef-noodle soup and sukiyaki falls dramatically.
Because they deal with animals, shortcuts cannot be taken, and there are limits to mechanization, particularly in creating the type of beef that Japanese consumers demand.
In some cases, consumers have been known to act on the strength of brand alone, even purchasing a product with relatively limited knowledge about it.
The idea is that price action will trigger both the “wealth effect” and “animal spirits,” thus inducing consumers to spend more and companies to invest in future capacity.
Traditional relationships between consumers and producers are breaking down in other ways, too.
When there are competing technological approaches, such as the famous contest in the 1970s between the Betamax and VHS standards for videotape, consumers are better served if these contests between similar standards are settled promptly and decisively, to preclude the risk of spending money on a losing technology.
And by providing assurances about the safety or effectiveness of new products and services, and setting minimum mandated standards, regulation gives consumers the confidence to try something new.
The third way in which regulation is good for an economy is precisely in its protection of consumers.
BackNext