Example collocations logo

Consider in sentence

4727 examples of Consider in a sentence

So one clear conclusion of the recent vote is that May will have to consider some “softer” form of Brexit than she was previously willing to countenance.
Countries worried about low voter turnout would do well to consider their compulsory model.
Now consider the two regional engines, Japan and China.
Consider the media.
The revelations of snooping by the US National Security Agency (NSA) will hasten a more realistic assessment of the Internet’s effect on politics, providing a welcome opportunity to consider what has gone wrong and what could be put right.
I consider fact-checkers to be the altar boys of journalism.
To understand the fallacy, consider your interaction with the neighborhood grocery store.
One way to understand current conditions – and what is needed to improve them – is to consider two events that recently attracted considerable worldwide attention: the launch of Boeing’s Dreamliner passenger jet and the tragic death of Apple’s Steve Jobs.
Consider the rise of digital technologies.
They are supposed to consider all possibilities, even disagreeable ones, and prepare the population for prospective developments.
Consider the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on climate change.
And China has been happy to use that leverage, often in ways that its competitors consider unfair.
To understand what it means to host a global sporting event, consider the fact that Putin’s government spent $51-70 billion to stage the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, and is projected to spend at least $14 billion hosting the current World Cup, which runs through July 15.
For example, consider what Russia gets in exchange for its $14 billion-plus investment in this year’s event.
Consider the European Central Bank's announcement in January that it would implement quantitative easing.
Now consider free speech.
To answer that question, we must consider what about globalization is generating returns for the wealthy.
Consider Ahmed El-Darawy, a former police officer and a popular pro-democracy activist who ran in Egypt’s first free and fair parliamentary election in 2012.
To understand this polity’s absurdity, consider how American political elites would act under Europe’s current system of representation.
Consider the muddle in the United Nations Security Council over Syria’s civil war.
If that money had been earned by selling a portion of a lung, or represented savings painfully accumulated during years of backbreaking work, we might consider the exchange more equal.
When the European Union last year considered lifting its symbolic arms embargo against China, none of the governments driving the proposal bothered to consider that this, too, would be symbolic, sending a message all over Asia that Europe was putting its political weight behind Chinese regional policies.
At this stage, it is doubtful that anyone would consider running a campaign on the basis of left-right divisions – not least because of deep rifts within the parties themselves.
But one need only consider the massive centralization of power among cryptocurrency “miners,” exchanges, developers, and wealth holders to see that blockchain is not about decentralization and democracy; it is about greed.
New America recently conducted unprecedented research to find out whether and how, after nearly two decades of research, data, and advocacy has crystallized the crucial linkage between gender and national security, US officials consider it when formulating policy.
Consider Germany’s refugee and immigration policies.
Although Germany has a National Action Plan, is 11th on the Global Gender Gap Index (which ranks countries on levels of gender equality), and has a strong female chancellor and its first-ever female defense minister, it still failed at first to consider how its policy might have different effects on men and women.
They blame the president for the dead and wounded on both sides and consider him incapable of changing his ways or his policies, despite his promises.
Consider solidarity, which is open to at least two interpretations: static solidarity, which concerns only the distribution of income and wealth, and the broader concept of dynamic solidarity, which concerns the production of income and wealth as well.
Consider November’s international summit on the financial crisis.
BackNext