Example collocations logo

Competition in sentence

2938 examples of Competition in a sentence

Of course, such competition carries risks – in particular, short-sighted efforts to boost growth in ways that exacerbate misallocation of resources, overcapacity, and high financial leverage.
The government sought to modernize the economic base by selecting and nurturing promising industries - limiting competition, supporting research and development and technology transfers, and encouraging the extension of credit.
The government also protected special interests, such as rice farmers and small retailers, against competition through a complex system of licensing, regulation, and quality controls.
Close partnership between business and government is in direct contrast to the western, particularly the American, model grounded in strong antitrust policy, competition, and private ownership.
In the face of a stagnant economy and an integrated global economy, Japan is under increasing pressure to modify its regulatory framework and promote competition.
These reforms will create new markets, stimulate competition, attract foreign investment and technology transfers, and improve consumer interests.
Competitive pressure from such investment, like import competition, will improve productivity.
AI is based on big data, and the availability of data is fundamentally a political matter that implicates issues such as privacy, transparency, security, and the rules that frame economic competition.
Losing one’s job in the US steel industry as mills shut down in the face of foreign competition may look awfully permanent.
Premium support can significantly reduce Medicare spending, as it establishes a framework for more efficient spending on benefits, driven by competition and innovation in care and coverage.
But in the competition for Chinese largesse, Kenya’s advantage over Zimbabwe ends there.
International and local competition for workers who do have the right skills is growing increasingly intense.
It is not price competition or the drive for profit that has made Harvard, Yale, or Stanford great.
There is competition, but of a different sort.
An Internet biography states that “with the same fierce focus he brings to competition,” Armstrong “tackled his illness and won.”
China’s policy creates adversarial currency competition with the rest of the world.
Powerful interest groups hinder competition in many sectors, often distorting markets for goods and services.
High-wage workers in rich countries can expect to see their competitive advantage steadily eroded by competition from capable and fiercely hard-working competitors in Asia, Latin America, and maybe even some day Africa.
Current-account deficits in the eurozone “periphery” have been halved, the competitiveness loss accumulated during the last decade has been reduced, and important structural reforms – making labor markets more flexible and opening up industries sheltered from competition – have been implemented.
On the other hand, as competition from extreme Islamist parties has intensified, Ennahda has been tempted to move to the right to broaden its electoral base.
The United States has experienced steady de-industrialization in recent decades, partly due to global competition and partly due to technological changes.
The loss of US manufacturing jobs accelerated after 2000, with global competition the likely culprit.
For these countries, honest competition at the ballot box, free and open debate, and respect for minority rights – the foundation of liberal democracy – are not currently on the agenda.
Congressional action in America was the last act of a long drama, and it cleared the way for US companies to bid for Indian nuclear contracts, an area in which they will face stiff competition from France and Russia.
It was at that crossroads that Israel and Iran, two powers vying for mastery in a rapidly changing Middle East, chose to cast their strategic competition in ideological terms.
To many economic liberals and traditional conservatives, such “tax competition” is a good thing, because it is assumed that lower taxes will unleash market forces, thereby fueling innovation and growth.
But tax competition should concern economic liberals.
Not only does it strengthen monopolistic trends and erode fair and transparent competition among firms; it also deprives governments of the money needed to sustain the public goods – education, health care, infrastructure, the rule of law – upon which firms rely.
For starters, tax competition among jurisdictions is quite different from competition among firms in the market.
Moreover, tax competition drives market concentration and monopolization, because it tilts the playing field in favor of incumbent multinational corporations, and against smaller potential competitors.
BackNext