Competition
in sentence
2938 examples of Competition in a sentence
Unfortunately, it continues to be a clientelist, corporatist, corrupt organization that does not believe in citizen participation, checks and balances, competition, accountability, or scrutiny of public-sector unions.
The first is embodied in the US Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, which provides workers affected by international
competition
with financial support for retraining, job search, relocation, income maintenance, and health insurance.
So, these “export” activities face a level of
competition
that the local grocer, coffee shop, or barber does not.
After all, whereas TAA targets individuals directly impacted by foreign competition, much of the
competition
faced by local economies is not coming from abroad, and many of the jobs being lost are not in the industries directly affected by outside competition, but in the surrounding economy.
Recognition of the corrosive effect of platform monopolies on
competition
and innovation is greater in Europe than in the US, but no one has found an effective regulatory strategy.
The OECD demands a smorgasbord of reforms affecting corporate governance, private insurance markets,
competition
policy, statistics, health, technology, agriculture, and many other regulatory areas.
As a new dawn breaks on Malaysia’s political landscape, the country must seize this opportunity to establish a viable model for multiparty competition, where politicians can lead on national issues rather than pander to religious, ethnic, or regional constituencies.
The proxy
competition
among rival monarchies, which led some of them to withdraw their ambassadors from Qatar in March, is intensifying violence and instability throughout the region.
But its potential for sustained growth is faltering, owing to the imminent decline of its working-age population – projected to fall by 25% by 2050 – and rising
competition
from China and other emerging economies.
If a young female lawyer or banker on a promising career track decides to leave the office “early” every day to be home with her kids for dinner, work part-time, or take time out to be a full-time caregiver, she is quickly knocked out of the
competition
for top jobs.
Both are key to a country’s commercial attractiveness – among the most important dimensions of global
competition.
The “law on growth and activity” that will be voted on this year will unleash the business sector’s energy, including by stimulating
competition.
Ironically, those who are caught often blame their misconduct on competition, pressure to publish, and recognition and prizes – the very practices and incentives that the scientific community introduced and fostered.
As Kevin Rudd, the former Australian prime minister, noted in a remarkable speech a few weeks ago, the US security establishment has become convinced that strategic engagement with China has not paid off and should give way to strategic
competition
– a stance that would encompass all dimensions of the bilateral relationship.
Areas of focus include competition, consumer protection, innovation and entrepreneurship, insurance and pensions, education, governance, and trade.
For much of its early history – to say nothing of the era of the Civil War and Reconstruction – the country was as closely divided as it is today, and bitter campaign rhetoric reflected the closeness of the
competition.
Because the biggest opportunities lie in spurring faster productivity catch-up by adopting and diffusing today’s best practices, politicians must keep pushing to reduce trade and regulatory barriers to market integration and
competition.
From the new governor of the People’s Bank of China to the cabinet and leading regulators, the new cohort has an opportunity to move China forward by promoting competition, decreasing the power of state enterprises, boosting household consumption, and reducing reliance on exports.
Opening markets to greater
competition
and rebalancing the roles of government and markets is the most promising strategy to achieve high-income status in the coming decades.
In short, tougher economic competition, slower growth, and low inflation may be here to stay.
The two tectonic shifts in the global economy – slower GDP growth and increased emerging-market
competition
– have created a fault line that runs through Europe.
The technical lead held by Europe’s traditional trading economies is being eroded, while wage
competition
is encouraging fears of deflation.
As soon as this goal comes close to being achieved, elements of the opposition begin to position themselves for the second phase of the struggle and the coming
competition
for power.
The challenges of a fast-growing population, inadequate education, insufficient jobs, corruption, bureaucracy, and rising global
competition
constitute the greatest threat to the country’s future.
The current mess stems partly from adherence to a long-discredited belief in well-functioning markets without imperfections of information and
competition.
Like an off-road rally through a mountainous desert, it promises excitement and fierce
competition.
And governments will determine whether we should prepare for bitter
competition
or a true team effort.
In that tradition, the economist Milton Friedman wrote, in his 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom : “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free
competition
without deception or fraud.”
Losing access to Chinese markets, capital flows, exports, and talent would result in higher prices and slower growth, whereas the benefits of reduced levels of
competition
to US industries are less clear.
Although the last two options might be difficult to merge –Mexico might not want the
competition
of such a large player as Brazil – they are not mutually exclusive.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Which
Market
Would
Between
Countries
Economic
Global
Other
There
Among
Trade
Policy
Markets
Economy
Should
World
Innovation
Foreign
Companies