Competition
in sentence
2938 examples of Competition in a sentence
Europe must have credible fiscal-consolidation plans to restore debt sustainability, but it is also essential that it has a growth strategy that includes policies aimed at boosting investment, freeing up product and labor markets, deregulating business, promoting competition, and building skills.
Individual development, of course, takes place under conditions of
competition.
And if you completely control the economic process and eliminate any kind of market process in competition, you are actually your underwriting a breakdown of your own system.
The market system, as an institution, as a process, is based on
competition.
Competition
means the free development of alternatives and the
competition
of alternatives with one another, and of course in the process of this competition, the production by innovation, by inventiveness, by alternatives and new proposals.
There is therefore a continuous effort in a market economy to reduce or eliminate
competition.
A market economy is always under danger of
competition
being restrained or eliminated.
To maintain
competition
is, thusly, not only a criteria for economic growth, but a matter of the good order of society.
If you want to keep a society open and capable to develop, you must see to it that the forces that want to eliminate
competition
are not successful.
In Germany the highest court decided that to the use of a contract, or the formation of associations on the basis of contract, for the purpose of eliminating
competition
was compatible with the law, it was compatible with the freedom to compete.
For Sherman,
competition
was the prevention of excessive power.
The protection of
competition
was the prevention of abusive power structures within civil society.
He didn't fear power structures that were based on government intervention or the desire by government to plan the economy, but those based on the desire of participants in the economic process to eliminate
competition
and determine the process of supply and demand by virtue of either monopoly or cartels.
These institutions, based on free trade, competition, limited budget deficits, and sound money, are fundamentally pro-market; there is little leeway within them for doctrinaire Socialism.
To navigate it, we need strong political will around the world – leadership over brinksmanship, cooperation over competition, and action over reaction.
Instead, policies that intensify competition, whether in trade, labor markets, or domestic production, may be socially destructive and politically explosive.
But the concrete policies needed to realize this aim are not, since reforming the welfare state and labor markets means more competition, which scares many citizens.
Aside from ignorance of the Lisbon Strategy among the public and inaction on long-term reforms among the member states, a second problem concerns the lack of acceptance of the virtues of
competition
– the most effective way to ensure quality, innovation, and low prices for consumers.
Competition
also puts an end to rent seeking and protection of traditional corporate advantages.
Of course, we must limit the scope of competition: there is no reason, for example, to extend it to taxation.
Similarly, while
competition
will improve the quality of research and education, this does not imply reduced public funding, a lower priority for basic research, or the elimination of scholarships.
Perhaps most importantly,
competition
is a powerful means to restore democracy and modernize political institutions by compelling policymakers to ensure transparency and accountability.
We must explain to citizens Europe’s contribution to public ethics, and the democratic virtues of fair
competition
in economic, political, and social life.
This would help avoid local
competition
between krill vessels and the creatures that need krill to live, since krill fishing closely overlaps with the critical foraging areas for penguins and seals.
For example, he pioneered the idea of school vouchers, arguing that private
competition
would ensure better educational performance than government systems.
The New “Two Chinas” QuestionNEW YORK – To anyone over the age of 60 who follows world affairs, the term “two Chinas” recalls the post-1949
competition
for diplomatic recognition waged by mainland (“Red”) China and Taiwan, or, more formally, the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China.
But they will necessarily heighten elements of competition, including
competition
for Russia.
Like in the natural world, this complex
competition
enables the production of both ecosystem “goods” and “services.”
As globalization increases competition, it also reinforces certain narratives – such as those dictating which research areas deserve the most funding.
What they can cause – through intensifying
competition
within the ecosystem – is h-index inflation, just as printing more money can cause price inflation.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Which
Market
Would
Between
Countries
Economic
Global
Other
There
Among
Trade
Policy
Markets
Economy
Should
World
Innovation
Foreign
Companies