Companies in sentence

7472 examples of Companies in a sentence

And it turns out that yes, those in the 20s and 30s put out a huge number of companies, form lots of companies, but most of them go bust.

But ... if we're going to talk about the perils of creativity becoming a means to get attention, then we have to talk about the attention-driven business model of today's big social media companies, right?

That feeling of inadequacy is what drives you to post, so you can get more attention, and then that attention that you get is what these companies sell, that's how they make their money.

When incentives don't work, when CEOs ignore the long-term health of their companies in pursuit of short-term gains that will lead to massive bonuses, the response is always the same.

And its 225 largest companies today are worth one quarter of what they were 18 years ago.

Among other things, because startup companies are .02

In fact, companies often declare success in a cancer trial if 15 percent of the patients had a complete response rate.

It's why companies are blindsided when plastic straws and bags and bottled water go from staples to rejects overnight, and baffled when a change in social mores turns stars into pariahs and colleagues into outcasts: ineradicable uncertainty.

Since then, I've used about 30 kinds of submarines and I've started three companies and a nonprofit foundation called Deep Search to design and build systems to access the deep sea.

Companies look at just their platform.

And so, most companies or law enforcement agencies that have this content can translate every file into a unique string of numbers.

The second is with companies: using it as clues to identify the hundreds of millions of files in circulation today, pulling it down and then stopping the upload of new material before it ever goes viral.

And now we're embarking on that second horizon: building the software to help companies identify and remove this content.

Let's talk for a minute about these companies.

Those come from just 12 companies.

Twelve companies, 45 million files of child sexual abuse material.

These come from those companies that have the money to build the infrastructure that it takes to pull this content down.

But there are hundreds of other companies, small- to medium-size companies around the world, that need to do this work, but they either: 1) can't imagine that their platform would be used for abuse, or 2) don't have the money to spend on something that is not driving revenue.

So we went ahead and built it for them, and this system now gets smarter with the more companies that participate.

And when the millions of hashes we have lead to millions more and, in real time, companies around the world are identifying and pulling this content down, we will have dramatically increased the speed at which we are removing child sexual abuse material from the internet around the world.

We have to activate thousands of officers, hundreds of companies around the world if technology will allow us to outrun the perpetrators and dismantle the communities that are normalizing child sexual abuse around the world today.

Now it's going to take the will, the will of our society to look at something that is really hard to look at, to take something out of the darkness so these kids have a voice; the will of companies to take action and make sure that their platforms are not complicit in the abuse of a child; the will of governments to invest with their law enforcement for the tools they need to investigate a digital first crime, even when the victims cannot speak for themselves.

And we're going to need a proactive solution from tech companies, from lawmakers, law enforcers and the media.

So now, we're right now engaged in a very public conversation about the responsibility of tech companies.

I am a capitalist, and after a 30-year career in capitalism spanning three dozen companies, generating tens of billions of dollars in market value, I'm not just in the top one percent, I'm in the top .01

I mean, public officials who worked for the state-owned phone companies demanded bribes from people who wanted phones.

But as companies like Samsung, Kia, Hyundai invested in innovations that made things much more affordable for so many more people, South Korea ultimately became prosperous.

And besides, many of these companies, their business model is attached to attention, which means these algorithms will always be skewed towards emotion.

So yes, these companies have to play a really important role in this process, but they can't control it.

There are also hundreds of very smart people working inside these companies, but again, these efforts can feel disjointed, because they're actually developing different solutions to the same problems.

Related words