Characters
in sentence
10488 examples of Characters in a sentence
Maybe that's because it's a melodramatic load of old rubbish, full of macho posturing, cheesy dialogue, overwrought slo-mo and
characters
saying 'Goddammit' a lot.
The
characters
leap from one frame of mind to another seemingly without cause - and certainly without explanation.
With Al Jolson at the height of his popularity and Warner Brothers's the Jazz Singer having been the highest grossing film of 1927, it was inevitable that the other studios would churn out a few vehicles for their own Jolson-esquire
characters.
All the
characters
and relationship between them was so cheesy, you just wanna laugh!!
Then there were the "we are spirits, thus we have no physicality" elements, which leads to the same problem that people had with GHOST, namely: If the
characters
have no physicality (i.e.
The script made no sense at all, I couldn't have cared less about the
characters
and the camera-work consisted of repeatedly showing shadow images of rats standing on their hind legs or running.
It's a little too slow-moving for my tastes, has zero likable
characters
in it and not much action until the very end, but Mitchell's dedicated central psycho performance as vengeance-minded whack-job Vincent Rinard is fun.
The
characters
are as memorable as the story line.
The bones of a good movie are here, and the directing from Shatner is not as bad as is commonly made out, but the
characters
end up speaking and acting way out of the style that the previous 3 films had carefully established.
With horrible acting, a painfully generic "plot" and no dimensional characters, no matter how bored and drunk you are, this one is not worth your 81 minutes.
another the pacing is very slow at times and there are many scenes of the
characters
repeating themselves.by
Set in an abandoned spaceship 1000 years in the future and peopled with
characters
and props right out of the 90's.
This movie is poorly structured, sadistic, cruel and filled with unlikable
characters.
The two
characters
who dominate the action -- the "evil lord" in his privileged bubble and the "stubborn, crazy artist" are pure types with zero subtlety or nuance, and all their actions emanate from cartoonish extremes.
Maybe it could become a classic because of all the weird over-acting :)(Gary Busey's character for example) All the over-acted
characters
were actually the only thing that made this movie a little interesting as they grabbed your attention (for all the wrong reasons obviously) where the movie in itself failed miserably.
You don't care one bit for any of the
characters
in the movie.
The
characters
are not particularly well drawn or in any way memorable, nor is the atmosphere particularly special.
The plot is layed out in the first few minutes, there is no suspense, the
characters
are cliché and despite plot twists that try to confuse and obfuscate, everything plays out exactly as you think it will.
I would say the
characters
are one dimensional but that would imply there was some sort of character development.
It has precious few scares (always a slight flaw for a "horror" movie, don't you think?); weak performances; countless scenes where
characters
foolishly wander off alone or turn down the opportunity to remain in the safety of a group; and some rather irritating editing techniques which add nothing whatsoever to the proceedings.
There is nothing to comment upon, since everything this movie wants to say was already told thousand times, the
characters
are far too thinly portrayed to become memorable, the "shocking events" that occur are also poorly illustrated and become unimportant.
I hand it to Walter for quickly and neatly setting up the main
characters
and location.
From the moment the principal
characters
and situation are introduced, it is paint-by-numbers as to where this plot will take us.
The sci-fi part of the film was very interesting and fantastic for its time, but i'm not sure if it was due to the fact it was shown directly after the Brilliant 1928 "The Wind" or if it seemed that Russian filmmakers take after what Russian novels are famous for (hundreds of characters, tangled plots) but I know for certain that the dramatic parts, as in the parts on Earth, made absolutely no sense, were boring and I became lost within about twenty minutes.
Its cast of mercenary, lascivious, ruthless, duplicitous, shallow
characters
are intended as a reflection on its post-eighties setting and I have to admit in this regard it is an accurate creation.
The plot only loosely resembles the one in the book, the
characters
are completely miscast and there's some appalling acting.
The other
characters
in this wacky murder mystery are: Lake's suspicious wife, a self-satisfied private detective, a seemingly slow-witted janitor (Willie Best), Lake's auditor, a songwriter who thinks Lake is stealing from him and another who thinks everyone is stealing from him.
How he would suddenly pop up in the film, and would start emptying his M16 at the
characters
in the movie.
Describing how bad Madonna's acting looks like is impossible and the end result is one of the most annoying
characters
ever captured on film.
Some of the tunes are catchy, some of the
characters
are interesting in their quirky Waters-like way, and the portrayals are fine although sometimes overdone.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Story
There
About
Other
Really
Which
Great
Could
Acting
Would
Interesting
Actors
People
Between
Character
Where
First
Scenes
