Example collocations logo

Characters in sentence

10488 examples of Characters in a sentence

besides two characters getting together at the end, nothing is ever resolved, and there is no plot.
Best around the middle, when most characters get horny and go after someone they haven't had before.
Also, when the characters were driving in a truck, the engine noise (or radio?
The music is great, the dialogs are unintentionally hilarious and the characters are the most ridiculous ones I ever beheld.
The "acting" of the main characters is so wood like, Pinocchio would have done a better job!
The opening scenes were so long winded, the conversations between characters seemed not to lead anywhere.
The characters from the first film are great, and by the end you fell a connection to them.
Both lead characters have the maturity of seven-year-olds and are much less interesting to spend time with.
It may have done so had the characters not just been mouthpieces for incredibly dire, unrealistic drivel.
When you make a film with a killer-kids premise, there are two effective ways to approach it; you can either make it as realistic as possible, creating believable characters and situations, or you can make it as fun as possible by playing it for laughs (something which the makers of "Silent Night, Deadly Night" did, for example, on an equally controversial subject: a killer Santa).
There is no coherent plot, no fully fledged characters, no real comedy, no interesting scenery, no surprises, and no good performances (except Jon Herder, he does something with very little).
no real characters etc.
Imagine a decent script with a few solid characters that you care about and some damn explosive action, fights, shootouts, etc.
This movie had no endearing characters to warm to.
The locales change but the plots remain the same, and with the same shallow character development and the equally shallow acting as trained performers are asked to devolve into pseudo-cartoon characters and act accordingly.
The characters are unidimensional, underdeveloped, primitive.
anymore!" Anyway, both characters were distinctly unlikeable, especially Richard Gere's: a self absorbed plastic surgeon (Dr.
The characters are annoying, immature, and flaky....Madison being the most annoying of all.
My 2 /10 is for the first segment which in fairness is actually quite decent and if they had made the movie about the characters in section 1 alone it may have risen above the 5/10 mark.Once it moved into TV 'reality show' territory it stank to high heaven.
It takes about half the movie for the main characters to realize what the big hilly thing is in the middle of the city is spewing hot red stuff, and the other half spent diverting the lave flow through the city using fire trucks (yer right).
The funniest thing about Fortunes is that one of the main characters, Lewis (Urbaniak) has writer's block and apparently so did the screenplay writer for the film.
There are three major problems with this movie: 1) The plot - or should I say plots - are all over the place, there are some characters who get a lot of screen time but serve little purpose, 2) There are only 4 fight scenes in total, some of them completely unrelated to the main plot and some taking place in the dark, 3) The music score is overzealous and overbearing.
I mean come on this movie is so stupid the characters are so poorly developed,and eve Robert Englund makes the movie worse I mean he might as well be transformed into Freddy Kruegur and Spook people.
I am thinking that it was probably the first...but in the failed attempt..it simply ended up to be a piece of artsy garbage with lots of blood, some obnoxious characters, and an over reliance on religious symbolism.
The acting overall was even and the characters endearing enough that you regretted they died off like recently sprayed roaches, scattering off to die their own gruesome deaths.
The characters were shallow, the dialog stilted, the acting bad, and yes that includes Seymour.
None of the characters are what they should be: Fanny is lively and conscious of her mistreatment, while Sir Thomas, who treated her very well, seems to have accidentally fallen into Aunt Norris' personality.
It's clear that for this film they wanted to have the story line driven by the characters.
But immediately the story line causes you to dislike the new main characters.
Most of the other characters in the movie lack the punch of the original (Henry Wilcoxon for example) except for the hystericly funny lawyer Peter Blunt, being played by Randy Quaid.
BackNext