Carbon
in sentence
2411 examples of Carbon in a sentence
Rather than using taxpayers’ money to fuel climate change, these governments should be pricing
carbon
out of the market through taxation (an imperative that is especially relevant for Africa, which will pay the highest price for potential climate catastrophes, despite having contributed very little to the problem).
It featured six scenarios of possible futures, including a world in which full three-dimensional casts of human faces can be created from a single strand of DNA; buildings are covered with a skin capable of photosynthesis, taking in
carbon
dioxide and releasing oxygen; and death can be beaten by bringing back those who choose to be cryogenically preserved.
It would also avoid the need for dramatic increases in gasoline or
carbon
taxes, which are broadly accepted in Europe and Japan, but remain the kiss of death for American politicians.
Fourthly, China has increased its
carbon
sinks by promoting reforestation.
However, in order to fulfill that promise, the industrialized world must give Africa a chance through the emerging international
carbon
market.
The best approach would be for Europe, Japan, and Canada to buy certificates of biological
carbon
sequestration from Africa as part of their efforts to meet their obligations under the Kyoto Protocol.
Under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries (so-called “Annex I countries”) have the right to purchase certificates of
carbon
sequestration from reforestation projects undertaken in developing countries and use them to offset up to 1% of their 1990 greenhouse-gas emissions from industry, transport and housing.
This requires modifying some of the rules governing its own internal
carbon
market, the EU Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
Under current EU ETS rules,
carbon
credits generated by forestry projects undertaken in the CDM currently have no value, despite their obvious climate, environmental, and social benefits.
The EU ETS’s exclusion of
carbon
credits from forestry projects will remain in force at least until 2008, with the question of whether to include them subsequently set to be revisited next year.
So why not liberalize the
carbon
market as well – a move that would help, not hurt, domestic producers?
The second change would allow forestry and land-use projects that are eligible to issue
carbon
credits to include such activities as re-vegetation, forest restoration, and improved agricultural management.
The responsibility for reforming the emerging
carbon
market does not lie solely with the North.
All parties to the Kyoto Protocol, including African nations, have a unique opportunity to influence the post-2012 debate and defend the inclusion of land-use projects in the emerging
carbon
market.
Adaptation could allow for higher
carbon
emissions in another way: reducing the damage and harm that we experience from global warming, giving us more time to implement alternatives to reliance on fossil fuels.
To arrive at an informed answer, we need to work out how the planet will look in 2100 if we invest different amounts in adaptation and
carbon
cuts.
Importantly, the new research shows that adaptation would achieve a lot more than cuts in
carbon
emissions.
This has stalled progress on many of the issues – including reducing
carbon
emissions, establishing global financial regulatory measures, and concluding the Doha Round of global trade talks, to name a few – that require global attention.
In other words, we have committed ourselves to working together to confront this challenge, and our work so far has been extremely promising: we supported the Climate Change Act; we helped set strong, scientifically robust targets for
carbon
reduction; and we have supported each successive
Carbon
Budget up to the latest, fourth installment.
One of the important first steps, which the CLG encouraged, was making the UK the first country to establish legally-binding targets for
carbon
reduction well into the 2020’s.
How, for example, does one account for and mitigate the
carbon
emissions embedded in goods?
Climate change represents a market failure; in such circumstances, companies must cooperate with their regulators in attempting, for instance, to create mechanisms to generate a representative
carbon
price.
Today, there are seven billion people on the planet, and each one, on average, is responsible for the release each year of a bit more than four tons of
carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere.
Global warming is real and is caused by emissions of
carbon
dioxide (CO2).
Worst of all, they carry large and unsustainable costs in terms of
carbon
emissions.
Compared to the advanced countries, the developing world now has both low per capita incomes and low per capita levels of
carbon
emissions.
The advanced countries are collectively responsible for much of the current stock of
carbon
in the atmosphere, as well as for a significant (though declining) share of the world’s annual emissions.
If developing countries are allowed to grow, and there is no corresponding mitigation of the growth in their
carbon
emissions, average per capita CO2 emissions around the world will nearly double in the next 50 years, to roughly four times the safe level, regardless of what advanced countries do.
The best way to implement this strategy is to use a “carbon credit trading system” in the advanced countries, with each advanced country receiving a certain amount of
carbon
credits to determine its permissible emission levels.
As for developing countries, while they would not have explicit credits or targets until they graduate to advanced-country status, they would know that at some point (say, when their
carbon
emissions reach the average level of advanced countries) they would be included in the global system of restrictions.
Back
Next
Related words
Emissions
Dioxide
Would
Global
Climate
Energy
Which
Price
Atmosphere
Countries
Change
Their
Could
Reduce
Other
About
There
Taxes
World
While