Carbon
in sentence
2411 examples of Carbon in a sentence
Here's where the soil comes in: there is about three thousand billion metric tons of
carbon
in the soil.
That's roughly about 315 times the amount of
carbon
that we release into the atmosphere currently.
And there's twice more
carbon
in soil than there is in vegetation and air.
There's more
carbon
in soil than there is in all of the world's vegetation, including the lush tropical rainforests and the giant sequoias, the expansive grasslands, all of the cultivated systems, and every kind of flora you can imagine on the face of the earth, plus all the
carbon
that's currently up in the atmosphere, combined, and then twice over.
Hence, a very small change in the amount of
carbon
stored in soil can make a big difference in maintenance of the earth's atmosphere.
But soil's not just simply a storage box for carbon, though.
It operates more like a bank account, and the amount of
carbon
that's in soil at any given time is a function of the amount of
carbon
coming in and out of the soil.
Carbon
comes into the soil through the process of photosynthesis, when green plants take
carbon
dioxide from the atmosphere and use it to make their bodies, and upon death, their bodies enter the soil.
And
carbon
leaves the soil and goes right back up into the atmosphere when the bodies of those formerly living organisms decay in soil by the activity of microbes.
See, decomposition releases
carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere, as well as other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, but it also releases all the nutrients we all need to survive.
One of the things that makes soil such a fundamental component of any climate change mitigation strategy is because it represents a long-term storage of
carbon.
Carbon
that would have lasted maybe a year or two in decaying residue if it was left on the surface can stay in soil for hundreds of years, even thousands and more.
Soil biogeochemists like me study exactly how the soil system makes this possible, by locking away the
carbon
in physical association with minerals, inside aggregates of soil minerals, and formation of strong chemical bonds that bind the
carbon
to the surfaces of the minerals.
See when
carbon
is entrapped in soil, in these kinds of associations with soil minerals, even the wiliest of the microbes can't easily degrade it.
And
carbon
that's not degrading fast is
carbon
that's not going back into the atmosphere as greenhouse gases.
But the benefit of
carbon
sequestration is not just limited to climate change mitigation.
Soil that stores large amounts of
carbon
is healthy, fertile, soft.
And second: soil use and degradation, just in the last 200 years or so, has released 12 times more
carbon
into the atmosphere compared to the rate at which we're releasing
carbon
into the atmosphere right now.
Peatlands in polar environments store about a third of the global soil
carbon
reserves.
These peatlands have a permanently frozen ground underneath, the permafrost, and the
carbon
was able to build up in these soils over long periods of time because even though plants are able to photosynthesize during the short, warm summer months, the environment quickly turns cold and dark, and then microbes are not able to efficiently break down the residue.
So the soil
carbon
bank in these polar environments built up over hundreds of thousands of years.
And when permafrost thaws and drains, it makes it possible for microbes to come in and rather quickly decompose all this carbon, with the potential to release hundreds of billions of metric tons of
carbon
into the atmosphere in the form of greenhouse gases.
I mean managing land in a way that's smart about maximizing how much
carbon
we store in soil.
And we can accomplish this by putting in place deep-rooted perennial plants, putting back forests whenever possible, reducing tillage and other disturbances from agricultural practices, including optimizing the use of agricultural chemicals and grazing and even adding
carbon
to soil, whenever possible, from recycled resources such as compost and even human waste.
This effort that started in France is known as the "4 per 1000" effort, and it sets an aspirational goal to increase the amount of
carbon
stored in soil by 0.4 percent annually, using the same kind of climate-smart land management practices I mentioned earlier.
And if this effort's fully successful, it can offset a third of the global emissions of fossil-fuel-derived
carbon
into the atmosphere.
But even if this effort is not fully successful, but we just start heading in that direction, we still end up with soils that are healthier, more fertile, are able to produce all the food and resources that we need for human populations and more, and also soils that are better capable of sequestering
carbon
dioxide from the atmosphere and helping with climate change mitigation.
We can start by treating the soil with the respect that it deserves: respect for its ability as the basis of all life on earth, respect for its ability to serve as a
carbon
bank and respect for its ability to control our climate.
Number four: pollution in the region has increased the amount of black
carbon
that's deposited on our glaciers.
Black
carbon
is like soot.
Back
Next
Related words
Emissions
Dioxide
Would
Global
Climate
Energy
Which
Price
Atmosphere
Countries
Change
Their
Could
Reduce
Other
About
There
Taxes
World
While