Budget
in sentence
5887 examples of Budget in a sentence
But the third one...what happened to the animation??? it looks low
budget
like a sat morning cartoon!
There are obvious
budget
constraints but with a little thought and attention to detail the movie could have been so much better.
I have a friend that works at blockbuster, and he gets 5 free movie rentals a week, so one day as we were scouring the aisles for something interesting, i stumbled across 18 Weapons of Kung Fu, and judging by the box alone, this movie seemed pretty wack, but nonetheless we gave into temptation and rented it -- afterall, it was free.....and thank god it was....this is by far THE WORST movie i have ever seen....the
budget
must have been a pickle and a piece of string...the plot was ridiculous, the only mention of the "18 weapons" is that there is some book that teaches the ways of the 18 weapons that some bad guy is after -- and thats it!
Don Wilson stars as Jack Cutter (Ooh real tough name!)a vampire slayer who goes up against a vampire army, you see the story is a little different because vampires can't be killed with silver, crosses or sunlight but rather through snapping their necks (How convenient as it cuts down on the budget) and it's here Cutter runs into a reporter (Melanie Smith of Trancers III fame) Night Hunter's action sequences shake for no reason during the fight sequences and although it's meant to emphasize the mood, it just makes the movie more jarring.
Of course the most interest comes from the fact that indeed this predates Blade, however the problem is that this was done on a small
budget
and that it had Don Wilson in it.
Clearly the work of a first-time director with a small
budget
who either lacked or didn't sufficiently heed good advice.
This film is a perfect example that a movie can not be successful with a high
budget
alone.
H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds by director David Michael Latt is a slightly less-than-average flick which isn't too bad if one considers the
budget
he had to work with - only $1 million.
For this budget, the production value wasn't too bad - the best part of it is the visual effects (I was thoroughly impressed with the CGI considering the budget) and sound design.
The less-then-stellar parts of this film are the story which is VERY prolonged at best (but again I think this is because of the
budget
they had - they had to prolong certain scenes to create the feature length 97 minutes), the acting (again it's because the actors had no story to work with), very few exceptional camera shots, and the music.
However, again, I can let the negative parts go for the most part only because this film was made for a meager
budget
and still had good production value.
Still you should,d see it for the sake of seeing how a low
budget
version of War of the Worlds CAN be made even with flaws.
I think, however, that the film's biggest sin is its lack of a
budget.
It isn't when it's done on a low
budget.
Talk about low budget, one torture scene consists of a guy getting a mug of coffee thrown over him while he's tied to a chair.
Not to be mistaken as the highly touted Samuel L. Jackson vehicle SNAKES ON A PLANE; SNAKES ON A TRAIN is low budget, features no actors(to speak of), but some pretty decent visual effects.
Not even Michael Bay had a
budget
that big for Transformers, so exactly how Universal Pictures spent that much cash making Evan Almighty is a mystery.
The
budget
was less that $20,000 and the script looked like a child wrote it.
This film is a real loser and it copies situations from big
budget
horror movies and not to mention soundtracks to.
It is a low
budget
movie with amateur actors.
A very low
budget
movie that could have been filmed anywhere with outtakes of Venezuela.
It wasn't just the low
budget
that makes this film bad (many great films have been made on a low budget), it is simply a bad movie and it wasn't even bad enough to be good camp.
We decided to look in the low
budget
horror section.
The acting and the not-so special effects were nowhere near the standard of even the lowest
budget
B-movies.
I give a lot of low
budget
movies a pass, but this shouldn't have been made, or should have been made by someone else.
Okay, make no mistake - this is a pretty awful film, but I actually thought it had a couple of creepy scenes and overcame its pathetic
budget
every now and then.
So, in conclusion, I suggest you blow the
budget
and order a DVD of this one as soon as possible.
His features of this time look more like real low
budget
thrash z garbage movies.
I really tried to enjoy it but it was like a student film, they must have had the smallest
budget.
With clunky, self-consciously informative dialog and sub-par acting, even a relatively impressive
budget
with attention to detail will not spring to life this sagging, albeit historically worthy, melodrama.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Deficit
Would
Deficits
Which
Government
Could
About
Spending
Their
Fiscal
There
Other
Countries
Years
Should
Public
Movies
Films
While