Example collocations logo

Budget in sentence

5887 examples of Budget in a sentence

If you have never seen over five gay films, or have recently come to terms with being gay, you may find this film interesting, otherwise it's your run-of-the-mill low budget movie.
A low budget effort from Texas that's at least filmed well, but that is little consolation.
The ONLY reason this doesn't get 1/10 is becuz condsidering the low budget, they did OK.
The film was obviously shot on a budget as the locations look cheap and all the actors are rubbish.
Director and photographer Timothy Hines didn't have much of a budget compared to Spielberg's Herculean effort with the same material (rumored to be the most expensive movie ever made), but that need not be an insurmountable handicap.
Slashers.....well if you like horrors its definitely one to see, otherwise don't even bother.It is completely obvious that this film has an extremely low budget, For instance it looks as if the entire film has been shot in a warehouse somewhere, and on numerous occasions you will see the mike boom shadow and the camera mans shadow, trust me you wont need to look for them.Also try to ignore the cheesy actors, if thats what you call them!!The basic outline is a few people decide to go on a game show where they have to survive a night in a big maze due to their being 3 killers on the loose and whoever live's at the end gets rich.
Now there is something about this film that keeps you watching and rarely do you find that with a cheap budget horror these days,For example when i watched it i thought to my self i would'nt mind having a go at this game!
It's like this movie had a $5 budget and left with change.
After watching it, I just laughed it off and told myself, "oh boy, just another low budget B-movie.
Yeah, this was charming and state of the art when Hitchcock was filming "The Birds" but in 2005 it just looks low budget.
There is virtually no budget and the film doesn't look nearly as polished as this.
The racing scene are so low budget they sped them up to make it look like the cars are "going fast" In one scene a Mercedes SLR goes from over 200 to 0 in like 4 seconds by just spinning around in circles.
I feel like the movie was porely made, which i will give some understanding due to budget constraints on making it.
This was by far the worst low budget horror movie i have ever seen.
This movie DID have a budget and it had a casting department, so, if you're going to make a movie about a true life story, and actually put "the true story" in the title, shouldn't some effort be put forward to try and capture some realism ?
I love low budget independent films and had high hopes for this one.
Never mind the production value, which is very noble for its budget, but the pacing is deadly.
This is a low budget Roger Corman horror/creature flick.
I think Racquel Welch would have been a better choice, but considering the film's apparent TV movie budget, they probably couldn't afford her.
I own almost every Seagal movie (yes even ones like this that are low budget), and I must say, this may be the worst, not only of his movies, but of all movies ever made.
As a cheap, low budget production, most of the action revolves around Rogers and her lead man (some guy, I don't care who he is 'cause he really sucked) talking about their various possibilities of solving the crime, while being constantly cut off by an absurd detective with his head in his butt.
It must have had a very low budget because a fair amount of the movie must have been filmed with a regular video camera.
The show was high budget and too expensive to continue.
Many small low budget films have the potential to become great movies, but this movie is no where near that.
Clearly a low budget: nothing all that innovative, an actress (if you can call what she does "acting") who always has roles with nudity in a shower scene, a man in a reptile suit almost modeled after predator, a cabin in the woods, etc.
I was expecting a low budget Nazi version of the DaVinci code or the Boys from Brazil or even Shockwaves.
Looks like the production budget was very generous as well.
How this movie got made with a supposedly $70 million budget and without being completely retooled is beyond me.
Casting aside many of the favorable comments that have obviously come from friends and/or relatives that pepper this and many other low budget independents listed on IMDb, one is lost when it comes to using these reviews as an accurate gauge.
Too many would be film makers like Kallio, who were raised on low budget horror flicks of the last few decades, fail to dig their own fresh grave.
BackNext