Example collocations logo

Budget in sentence

5887 examples of Budget in a sentence

Just imagine what Carpenter can do with a Hollywood level budget.
the lighting creates mood and a beauty that is usually found in a much bigger budget film.
Everyone who has ever wondered how to make a film on no budget should see this documentary.
Porno Holocaust is extremely low budget as expected.
After I read that ''At the time of its release in 2002, its budget of $47 million, or 327,000,000 FRF, was said to make it the costliest French film ever.
However, Astérix et Obélix contre César (1999) had a budget of $48 million, or 274,620,000 FRF, which supposedly made it the most expensive French film ever'' I discovered the reason why I found this movie to be one of the most beautiful and colorful of all I have ever seen.
Looking for kick ass action movie with lower then low budget, this is it.The plot line may have been a little thin, but what B movie isn't.
We went to the cinema expecting a biggish budget release and got an art-house movie.
The makers of Ernest Goes to Africa did not rise to the creative challenges inherent in low budget film production.
The earlier film had potential, but reeked of a small budget and improvised quality in the worst ways- plot holes and wooden acting from amateurs.
The premise is rather original and well thought-of, but unfortunately, siding a good story is very low budget that doesn't even allow for decent special effects.
DO expect to be entertain, to laugh, and to enjoy the experience.All in all this film is MUCH better than many if not all of the low budget horror films out there.
The effort that was put into this film far out weighs the set backs it faces by having a limited budget.
Although he had a small budget and couldn't use color (which is one way Memento worked), it was just too hard to distinguish between time.
This film proves you don't need a Hollywood budget to make something fun to watch.
I think anybody who makes low budget movies can relate to certain scenes such as actors who just can't get that one line, being bothered by the police, and having most of the crew disappear after the first week.
I feel this was a very ambitious (and quite competently pulled off...) undertaking for a bunch of 18/19 year olds with no budget and little experience.
I think that each aspect of the film - the direction, the acting (though the character's performances are more likened to stage or free-form performance because of the nature of the film...) the production, the FX, the score/sound design - all are far superior to many films I've seen that exceed these kids budget and experience ten-fold.
This is an obviously low budget film in the spirit of Boondock Saints.
Look, this is a low budget horror film that suffers from all of the problems that go with low budget movies.
The professional aspect of the movie is astonishing considering it's relatively low budget.
In fact, it was the financial restrictions of the depression that temporarily killed off the genre, at least in the "A" budget bracket.
The fact that slashers are well known for it's low budget, lame plot, cheesy effects, and everything you may add, it doesn't means that there can't be good slasher movies.
This flick is clearly a labor of love and the budget probably not half of Mr. Tarantino's salary.
The Egyptian, along with El Cid and other favorites of the era of the wide screen, big budget epics had merit.
OK,so this film is NOT very well known,and wasn't very well publicised.I discovered this fairly brutal gangster gone good movie by complete accident on one of Skys millions of movie channels late on some boring evening,but I'm glad i did!The opening sequence to this film is fantastically comical in a very dark way.This in fact sets what i think is the general tone for the movie.I think a lot of critics and movie fans that have actually seen this film have been a bit unfair to just write it off as a lower budget gangster movie in the Reservoir Dogs vein.OK,so there are undeniable similarities between Thursday and some other crime genre films that it has been compared to,but in all fairness,i think this film takes a much more darkly comic look at this type of film,and the end result is a engrossing,well made,funny,if not totally original film.Tom Jane is good in this,and deserves the recognition he will now hopefully get thanks to the The Punisher.His performance as the bad guy gone good is realistic,funny and just cold enough to make you believe Casey really was a bad ass before he reformed.Thats another thing that makes this film stand out for me,the characters.In Nicks gang you get the strangest trio of criminals ever assembled,a smooth,charismatic but very cold leader(Nick),a trigger happy blood loving sexually predatory bitch of a woman(Dallas)and a psychotic hill billy with brains with a penchant for torture(Billy Hill).Throw in the most bizarre police detective ever seen on screen,beautifully over played by Mickey Rourke,and you've got a recipe for...well for Thursday really.Its at times darkly comic,sometimes brutal,sometimes unoriginal,but always engrossing and worth watching.8/10
One thing that came across to me in watching this film is that it was fun/exciting for the cast and crew; I could sense that they were going up against the budget constraint with enthusiasm & dedication because they apparently liked the people involved.
What matters about this film is that director Fred Olen Ray seems to realize that serious sci-fi very rarely works, and when your budget is skimpy it is best not to take yourself to seriously.
And he uses his low budget palette to wrap his grot blanket around you like a bad memory.
Instead I will just say that this was a very entertaining story with some very nice special effects (and some that looked a little lower in budget, but still decent enough to enjoy).
BackNext