Example collocations logo

Bargaining in sentence

331 examples of Bargaining in a sentence

Labor unions that had long protected the rights of workers in Western countries lost their bargaining power, and with it the ability to negotiate for more humane working conditions and higher wages at home.
For example, collective bargaining not only balances the distribution of productivity gains between employees and employers, but also serves as an institutional platform for resolving labor disputes.
Negotiation is necessary, and it must be sufficient, but progress will be impossible if North Korea is allowed to turn its mere participation in the six-party talks into a bargaining chip.
Nor can we overlook the banal bargaining of European leaders, the quarrels over budgets, and the rise of national egoisms whenever elections loom.
This type of regional coordination might also enhance the bargaining power of the countries involved, strengthening their global voice.
And there has been almost no formal cooperation among them, with each bargaining separately with Germany and the European Central Bank.
The collective bargaining power afforded by a coordinated diplomatic strategy would be sufficient to challenge the status quo.
If a power struggle emerges, the large Bushehr reactor could be used as a bargaining chip.
By contrast, the US market’s enduring weight amplifies America’s bargaining power in plurilateral trade agreements, which also serve the country’s immediate commercial interests.
This argument is not irrelevant; monetary policy probably has some effect on wage bargaining.
Its system of governance rests on the belief that an integrated process of bargaining, disagreement, reflection, and compromise – not top-down unchallenged decision-making – is the most effective route to wise, fair, and successful policymaking.
The problem is that both sides believe that showing willingness to compromise would weaken their future bargaining situation.
Consider the effects of pension “reforms” that force individuals to bear more risk, or of labor-market “reforms” that, in the name of boosting “flexibility,” weaken workers’ bargaining position by giving employers more freedom to fire them, leading in turn to lower wages and more insecurity.
Perhaps some of these outcomes were the result of hard bargaining by other trading partners (such as Australia).
If one main player slides back into economic turmoil, nationalism will reduce the scope for pragmatic bargaining.
Machiavellian deception is often part of a strategy, for example, in bargaining or even in bringing a group to accept new goals.
Those in the developing world who believe that there has been a history of bargaining in bad faith have a strong case.
To be sure, large labor-surplus economies’ deepening integration into the global market, together with increased reliance on automation and artificial intelligence, has weakened workers’ bargaining power and shifted labor demand into very specific and limited sectors.
And the current regulatory environment increasingly allows for large corporations to wield power without accountability, resulting in higher monopoly rents and greater bargaining power.
Not only has the Bank not been active in promoting these globally agreed standards, there is a concern that the Bank discourages collective bargaining and protections for workers when it talks about “flexible labor markets” and conditions that are conducive to private investment.
Lack of experience, primary caregiver responsibilities, bargaining style, and plain old discrimination all help to explain the gender gap.
The transition to a service economy often went hand in hand with the decline of unions, employment protections, and norms of pay equity, greatly weakening workers’ bargaining power and job security.
First, there is no reason that safe working conditions, freedom of association, and collective bargaining cannot be introduced at earlier stages of development than has occurred historically.
Trade agreements are time-consuming to negotiate and often narrow in scope, and the EU’s common commercial policy and the 500 million consumers living within its borders give it strong bargaining power.
In his view, bilateral negotiations put the US, as a political and economic hegemon, in a stronger bargaining position.
And regardless of whether France and Germany agree on any given issue, all policy areas need to be opened up to a bargaining process that includes all other EU member states.
“Getting to yes” in a bargaining situation requires that the negotiators not only have a clear idea of their own top priorities, but also that they understand what the other side wants most.
But to send a positive message to voters, European leaders will have to rediscover the knack for pragmatic compromise and inter-governmental bargaining that used to be the hallmark of EU diplomacy.
The dispossessed minorities who have the strongest stake in civil rights play no role during the democratic transition for the simple reason that they cannot normally bring anything to the bargaining table.
Russia’s natural gas supplies to Europe play a vital role in this regard, because here, unlike in the case of oil, Russia’s bargaining position is very strong.
BackNext