Administration
in sentence
4645 examples of Administration in a sentence
The Bush
administration'
s impatience with institutions and allies thus undercuts its own objectives.
On April 3, the Trump
administration
announced its intention to impose tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese exports, in response to industrial espionage, licensing, and other intellectual-property concerns.
But neither those concerns nor Chinese retaliation will win the US any sympathy, because the administration’s latest action comes on the heels of bogus US steel and aluminum tariffs, trumped up, as it were, on national security grounds.
The soonest the administration’s $50 billion of proposed tariffs can come into effect is at the end of a 60-day comment period.
Feeling the heat, the Trump
administration
could choose to nuance its intellectual-property policy, just as it nuanced its steel and aluminum measures.
Those who question whether the
administration
has any inclination of going this route should note that it did, in fact, file a WTO complaint against Chinese technology licensing practices in March.
The Drums of Trade WarBEIJING – Last month, US President Donald Trump’s
administration
fired the opening salvo in what is quickly shaping up to become a full-blown trade war.
In particular, the Trump
administration
takes issue with the Made in China 2025 strategy, introduced by China’s State Council in 2015 with the aim of boosting ten strategic industries, including advanced information technology, automated machine tools and robotics, aviation and spaceflight equipment, and electric vehicles.
The fact that the Trump
administration
has taken the approach it has suggests that it does not merely want to ensure that China complies with existing rules; it wants to prevent China from catching up to the US technologically.
This reading is reinforced by the National Security Strategy that the Trump
administration
released last December, which asserted that the US would “respond to the growing political, economic, and military competitions we face around the world.”
The Obama
administration
also announced that, whatever the outcome of the defense-budget debates, “we are going to make sure that we protect the capabilities that we need to maintain our presence in the Asia-Pacific” region.
During Obama’s first year in office, his
administration
placed a high priority on cooperation with China, but Chinese leaders seemed to misread US policy as a sign of weakness.
The
administration
took a tougher line when Clinton addressed the South China Sea question at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations meeting in Hanoi in July 2010.
The Obama administration’s pivot towards Asia signals recognition of the region’s great potential, not a clarion call for containment.
It is the citizens of urban enclaves who are taking part in establishing budget priorities and counseling government through a decentralized policy of
administration.
Many in his
administration
regard the World Trade Organization’s principles and procedures as an obstacle to bilateral negotiations.
The Trump
administration
now wants to trap the Chinese elephant.
Thanks to the profligacy of the current Bush
administration
(and the prudence of the Clinton administration), average Federal spending as a proportion of GDP under Republican presidents now exceeds that under Democrats during the measured period.
More low-income housing credit has been one of the few issues on which President Bill Clinton’s administration, with its affordable-housing mandate, and that of President George W. Bush, with its push for an “ownership” society, agreed.
During US President Jimmy Carter’s administration, when the Shah fell and the US embassy staff was held hostage for more than a year, the two sides were hopelessly divided.
Under US President Ronald Reagan and his vice president and successor, George H. W. Bush, the situation was complicated further by the Iran-Contra scandal, in which senior Reagan
administration
officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran between 1985 and 1987, despite an arms embargo.
The efforts of President Bill Clinton’s more pliable
administration
to bring about a thaw were repeatedly rebuffed.
In his victory speech, he promised that his
administration
would “deal fairly with everyone, with everyone – all people and all other nations.”
The Jewish community in the United States, and to a lesser extent President Barack Obama’s administration, has attempted to convince Chile and Mexico, which have not yet made their stances explicit, that nothing would be gained by isolating Israel (or the US, for that matter) on this issue.
The fifth lesson is that Trump will probably continue to prize loyalty above all else in his administration, just as Berlusconi has.
Even Trump’s non-family appointments – often controversial or radical figures who would not have a place in any
administration
except his – reflect an emphasis on personal loyalty.
Europe’s Lapse of ReasonNEW YORK – At long last, the United States is showing signs of recovery from the crisis that erupted at the end of President George W. Bush’s administration, when the near-implosion of its financial system sent shock waves around the world.
The Clinton
administration
has sought to split the difference by advocating a policy of somewhat smaller arsenals coupled with somewhat more defense.
The substitution of natural gas for coal has put the US on track to meet the Obama administration’s international commitment to reduce CO2 emissions 17% below 2005 levels by 2020.
But President Barack Obama’s
administration
has yet to decide which format it thinks best.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Would
Policy
Government
Trade
Their
About
Could
Economic
Other
After
Should
Countries
Public
Policies
Years
Under
There
Against
While